Markov79
Registered User
What would the order be knowing what we know now? Would there be a signifigant change?
Yes Bergeron would be a first rounder.Markov79 said:What would the order be knowing what we know now? Would there be a signifigant change?
PanthersRule said:Zherdev IMO would be picked slightly lower and Kastsystin slightly higher.
dont fix your mind with player stats ...go pierre hedin said:Nikolai Zherdev: Playing in NHL (very well).
Andrei Kastitsyn: Playing in Europe, 5th on Team Belarus in WJC scoring.
Therefore, Zherdev goes up... Kastitsyn goes down.
go pierre hedin said:1. Marc-Andre Fleury
2. Nikolai Zherdev
3. Eric Staal
4. Nathan Horton
5. Thomas Vanek
6. Milan Michalek
7. Dion Phaneuf
8. Ryan Suter
9. Braydon Coburn
10. Jeff Carter
Drop quite a bit:
- Steve Bernier
- Marc-Antointe Pouliot
Rise quite a bit:
- Zach Parise
- Anthony Stewart
- Patrice Bergeron
- Brent Burns
Over who? If you look at the draft, Fleury, Horton, Staal, Vanek, Zherdev are givens. Michalek was playing pretty well before his injury, so he'd still be there. Then there are the three defenseman, Suter and Phaneuf have been very good and Coburn still has tons of potential. I think all three d-men would still be top ten, though probably in a different order. Then there are Kostistyn and Carter who have done nothing to disapoint, especially Carter who showed great promise at the WJC with his size, speed, and skill. I think the draft would be very similar and I don't believe Parise would be in the top 13 if it were re-done. New York knew what they were getting into when they drafted Jessimen and Dustin Brown was good enough to make an L.A team so I think they'd stick with them.rtafts said:I just think that Parise would be in the top 10, at least.
Kryoptix said:in other words you can't tell that kasty is going down if you havent seen him play yet ...
so give me a break !
Exactly, im not trying to fell into the hype surrounding him..Vlad The Impaler said:Curious, you seem to have no problem with people who think very highly of AK without having seen him play either.
Double standards rule!
go pierre hedin said:Rise quite a bit:
- Brent Burns
#37-#93-#27 said:Bergeron and Burns would each be drafted much higher.
BartG101 said:Wow. Two lists without Vanek in the top 12....
Markov79 said:What would the order be knowing what we know now? Would there be a signifigant change?
BartG101 said:Wow. Two lists without Vanek in the top 12....
Say what? To me, Horton's season has done nothing to hurt nor help his stock. He's been solid for a rookie.PanthersRule said:2) Horton (Teams would know how he's playing now and realize that he'll be a star)
I agree completely. I wasn't to crazy about him prior to the draft and am still not excited by him seeing him now.Jacobv2 said:Say what? To me, Horton's season has done nothing to hurt nor help his stock. He's been solid for a rookie.
I apologize, I meant to say Dan Fritsche and got confused with Columbus and Minnesota - weird.ceber said:Just how much higher? Burns may have impressed some in the tournament, but do you guys really think he'd go much higher than 20? There's some pretty steep talent ahead of him, and most people were _very_ surprised to see him go in the first round, predicting more of a late second/early third. I would say Burns probably would stay about the same, maybe jump a spot.