Having a top 4 D or a top 6 center wouldn't have done them much better? You've gotta be kidding me.Gord Kluzak or Brian Lawton considering who went after
at least for EDM having Murray or Galchenyuk wouldnt have done them much better
Patrik Stefan over a Sedin was pretty bad, but ATL had an understanding with VAN
But scouting is much different today, it should be almost impossible for a #1OA to bust as bad as Nail Yakupov is busting right now. If he leaves for the KHL this summer he will end his NHL career with 136 points in 350 games, numbers that compete with Greg Joly, yet Yakupov was drafted in an era when scouting is infinitely better.Nope. He's up there for sure but guys like Daigle, Stefan, Lawton and Kluzak are worse. Also a guy named Greg Joly went #1 in the 70's and got 97 points in 365 career games.
Bust is a negative, so being the greatest at that negative means that he's the worst.Wouldn’t “GOAT bust” imply that he’s the all-time best player out of all the busts?
Yep he wanted to be a model or something. Also Patrik Stefan was plagued by injuries and had to retire early. Nail Yakupov has NO EXCUSE, he tries but he just really sucks. It's sad to see but it's the truth.Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Daigle have the skill? Just didn't want to play hockey? It's the exact opposite with Yak if so. He WANTS to play in the NHL. He's just god awful (outside of his hustle and shot).
I take Ryan Murray over him everyday and twice on Sundays in a re-draft (perhaps keeping us from the Reinhart trade)
Yep he wanted to be a model or something. Also Patrik Stefan was plagued by injuries and had to retire early. Nail Yakupov has NO EXCUSE, he tries but he just really sucks. It's sad to see but it's the truth.
Also this. You don't recover from this lol
McIlTrash is up there with other NYR legends like Jessiman and Brendl
Having a top 4 D or a top 6 center wouldn't have done them much better? You've gotta be kidding me.
Gord Kluzak or Brian Lawton considering who went after
at least for EDM having Murray or Galchenyuk wouldnt have done them much better
Patrik Stefan over a Sedin was pretty bad, but ATL had an understanding with VAN
What complete and utter nonsense. Yes, a team in dire need of secondary scoring and defensively sound defensemen would be far better of with one of those two. It takes a special kind of logic to come to a conclusion those two aren't a vast improvement over what Yakupov turned out to be.Cus the Oilers are a Ryan Murray/Galchenyuk away from being THAT much better? Think again.
Daigle imo, don't think anyone with his level of hype flopped before of after
So sick of hearing this.......
No Daigle was actually a decent player.He's up there with Alexandre Daigle.
Daigle had 50 points as an 18 year old on one of the worst teams of all time. He lead an NHL team in scoring one season. He was much better than somewhat servicable but he did flop very hard. Yakupov though just sucks he is the biggest bust by a wide margin.Hype wise, I don't think anyone or anything will ever beat Daigle.
He was hyped up as Gretzky and people absolutely bought into the hype machine.
He ended up being somewhat serviceable but man was his evaluation off the mark.
Think of how hfboards used to evaluate prospect with there number system for potential and letter system for likelihood of reaching said potential.
If hfboards would have been around for Daigle his realistic hfboards rating should have been something like 10 F (or even Z)
He was being compared to Ovechkin in his draft-year...definitely top 3 bust all time.
Daigle was a better player that Yak for sure, but if it were me I'd be more disappointed that my potential face of the league generational player ended up being a sometimes-2nd-line-winger than my potential 1st line winger washed out of the league entirelyDaigle was a three time 50pt scorer. Yak would finish with a career high of 33pts
Read what I was replying to.get used to it. worst #1 pick in the past 20 years or so. Edmonton would be downright scary had they taken one of the top dmen like Lindholm,Rielly,Trouba
What complete and utter nonsense. Yes, a team in dire need of secondary scoring and defensively sound defensemen would be far better of with one of those two. It takes a special kind of logic to come to a conclusion those two aren't a vast improvement over what Yakupov turned out to be.