If you want to live in a fantasy world and believe a fake news story like that go right ahead.To me he doesn’t look happy in Toronto. Just my opinion, I the leafs move on from this player, hence the hesitation to want to sign him long term.
Marner has another year. Argue against a Draisaitl comparable if Marner can put 80 pts up. Looking at p/60...there is already a case.Because every single comparable player to Marner has gotten under $7M on long-term contracts. There is no precedent over the last two years to indicate Marner could or would fetch anything more than $7M max.
The idea that he'll get $8M or $9M is absurd.
All facts and comparables indicate both Marner and Nylander will get $7M or less on 5-8 year deals.
he wasn't at a 100+pace from january 24th-on. he wasn't even at a 95 point pace. he was at a 92 point paceI really get Marner. He can be PPG next season. He was on a 100+ pace from jan 24th-on after getting more TOI and better linemates.
Why would he sign that?Habs will sign AM to an offer sheet for 13.5M after they draft Jack Hughes first overall in the 2019 draft
Oh no doubt. I am not saying it should or will happen. Just an interesting thought. I'd be terrified of the Leafs with JT and OEL playing 30 min a nightFine to think about it if it fills a need, but I don’t see the Leafs doing that ever.
Nah nah nah I am not saying that you're saying that. Just using it as an example.I didn't say the Leafs would get OEL for Nylander or Marner. I haven't brought up OEL once.
Why wouldn’t he?
if he wants to play infront of a low attendance, then we'd ship him to his hometown teamI look forward to the 5 daily threads of "mathews to the NYI".
The agent for Marner is confident that when he sits down with Dubas to begin serious negotiations on a new contract, there won’t be the kind of tension that many are expecting.
“I don’t anticipate a battle,” Darren Ferris said. “Everything will be done in time, and there isn’t any rush. Both sides will be patient. Both have a common interest, and I don’t anticipate it being difficult.”
Though Dubas and the representatives for each player can start negotiating on July 1, that’s not likely to happen. Dubas has indicated he will approach the Matthews and Marner situations with patience and with the appreciation that neither contract will get done over night.
Where the negotiations between Ferris and Dubas could get interesting is if there’s a contract sought that is more in line with what Matthews is expected to seek. If Marner has another season in which he was equal to or better than Matthews in some statistical areas, expect Ferris to make a case that his client should, at the least, be in line with Matthews contract-wise.
Because every single comparable player to Marner has gotten under $7M on long-term contracts. There is no precedent over the last two years to indicate Marner could or would fetch anything more than $7M max.
The idea that he'll get $8M or $9M is absurd.
All facts and comparables indicate both Marner and Nylander will get $7M or less on 5-8 year deals.
I don’t trust Austin at all. That’s why Tavares should be a Dubas priorityWow, lots of trouble in Toronto. First the Matthews-Babcock rift and now he's refusing to re-sign.
I agree. And Austin is right.This is bad new for leafs management.
It will only cost more to sign them in the future.
I still firmly believe tho that there is a MAJOR rift between Mathews and Babcock
I think babcock’s ego is a problem. He needs to be knocked down a peg or twoI agree. And Austin is right.
The Toronto media had to change his line combos for him for god sakesI think babcock’s ego is a problem. He needs to be knocked down a peg or two
Just because it’s only a story in big markets doesn’t make it any less of a problemThe Matthews and Babcock "tension" thread on the main page you try to make a big deal out of it, but the reality is players an coaches argued the ONLY reason it was reported is because It's the Leafs. ONLY in Toronto and MAYBE Montreal does that get reported
If there's one thing I've learned from reading Friedman threads (since he loves to speculate) it's that any time an analyst qualifies a statement as speculation or musing, it means they must be stating something as 100% fact, and if it doesn't happen they're a human garbage fire.Literally the first thing McKenzie says is that he has no inside information on this and is just speculating.
No offense to Friedman because among the Sportsnet insiders he's the only creditable one working for them, Bob McKenzie never says anything until he's got all the information first. This has been the only time I can remember him saying something that was based on a feeling and nothing more.If there's one thing I've learned from reading Friedman threads (since he loves to speculate) it's that any time an analyst qualifies a statement as speculation or musing, it means they must be stating something as 100% fact, and if it doesn't happen they're a human garbage fire.
Yea lets offer sheet the richest team in the NHL. I may as well sue Google, that will end just as well.