1994 hurt more because the team felt more "magical". It was something of a cinderella run, we were beloved of the Canadian media, "small market" franchise battling against an original six leviathan in the form of the New York Rangers. Come from behind in the Finals. That legendary game seven performance from Linden. It all felt like a beautiful underdog story that came up just short. It was bittersweet. Bittersweet STINGS. It hurts forever.
2011 is just bitter/sour. While the games were great and the team a magnificent juggernaut, it seemed like everything ran against us. The media loathed the team, and it got painted as divers/cheaters/chokers, in part due to our antic-prone antagonists and in part because the Auger incident painted a target on the organization. We got crumpled by key injuries at terrible times, drew into luckless matchups, got unprecedented suspensions and played a style that was the anti-thesis of how "playoff officiating" functions. Rather than come from behind in the finals, we were come from behind AGAINST, in a wildly lopsided, hugely demoralizing fashion, disassembled brick by brick by a team ALSO full of divers and antagonists who got to enjoy a "good old fashioned hockey club" narrative about heart and grit and determination because the media needs to sell some kind of story and that was the one they seized on.
Perhaps the single greatest Canucks moment of all time is nested inside that playoff run (Burrows OT goal against Chicago) and another top 5 contestant (Bieksa OT goal against Sharks), so I do like to go back and watch highlights from time to time, but there will always be a pall hanging over that season because of how it ended. And given it started the slow, sad distintegration of the team's competitive prospects, it's doubly obnoxious at the moment.