Hipster Doofus
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2006
- 6,515
- 0
I am so glad to hear you are so knowledgable on the future plans of Mr. Wang and Mr. Ratner and even more greatful you know Ratner will not let Wang run the team on the cheap.
I will agree Wang spent on Peca and Yahsin and Osgood and the building rocked, I know I was there, had season tickets, never missed a game. However after that initial cash infusion what happened? Never even came close to that first year he owned the team. Team played worse, people stopped coming. It is a simple fact you seem to have trouble grasping. I will also agree that the move does provide hope, but I hope for lots of things that never happen, I am sure you do too.
You cannot compare the local repsonse to the Nets to the Isles. With the Nets, they moved to an area steep in basketball history. Some of the best playground basketball players of all time come from Brooklyn. The was a huge article about it in SI a few months back. It's not a hockey hot bed and if you think for a second that a fan of the NYR is going to take season tix to the NYI just because they are cheaper, I have bridge to sell you. Might they go to a game or two? Sure but it is not going to offset the fan from LI that doesnt want to schlep in Brooklyn to watch a bad team. I said the move would be lamented when the team still sucks.
I know you are happy they ended up in Brooklyn because you have been a proponet of it since the idea first surfaced here. Personally I think you are glad because it makes getting to games easier for you.
As for my forecasting abilities, whether I have experience in sports revenue or not doesn't matter. While I care not to disclose to you my background or where I ply my trade, it doesn't matter if it is sports revenue, corporate revenue or the weather. Forecasts are not scientific. They are based on data usully culled from past performance applied to potential future earnings. Regardless it's a crap shoot. Just think back to the last time the weatheran forecated a foot of snow and not a flake fell. They had good data, but the consitions just were not favorable.
Oh BTW, the NY Times, while a good daily paper, has it's warts too.
Lmao forecasts are not scientific. Thats such a lame joke and complety untrue and you're using it as a metaphor and its awful.
First off, forecasts are designed to predict. So if its forecasted as snow, dress for cold and wet conditions. You dont wake up, throw on some shorts and say "ah **** it they're never right." Lets say hes overestimating the revenue increases, its still revenue increases. Just like if the weather guy is wrong on snow it still
might be brick out.
Not too mention your understanding of how revenue is created is very narrow. Barclays being accesable and cheaper means it can draw impulse demand. This is what kills the Isles on weeknight attendance. You cant just hop on a train to Nassau like you can to Barclays. Nassau relied on families buying season tickets and passing them down. Unfortunately that business model doesnt work for the NHL and cant support a competitive roster. If winning could create revenues to pay for winning, why did Wang stop investing after 2002? Cause hes evil? Or because even packed houses cant create the revenues they need to pay for a good team? Team needed corporate support, accessability, and luxury options. It got that.