Remember in Alfie's eyes, he asked for 4m a season due to 1m cheap year, (7+1)/2=4m a year. I'm surprised that just a few weeks before UFA, the Sens best offer was 4.5m, or (4.5+1)/2=2.75m a year. 2.75m for two years was the Sens absolute best offer to Alfie.
The Sens did a good job making people believe that Alfie wanted 7m, when he just wanted his 4m.
All that mathing for nothing. This is a silly argument that doesn't exist in the real world.
No dude, that's not how it works. You can't magically move half of his yearly salary to the previous year. There was "disputed" talk of some form of compensation, and you've all of a sudden rendered it fact and removed half of this years salary request.
1) Murray denied that there was any such agreement (this right here should have stopped you from assuming it was fact given that it's a "he say she say" situation with no verifiable proof)
2) We don't have 7 million to spend on a single player of Alfredsson's calibre at this point due to internal financing. Just because you've moved half the cash to last year doesn't remove the fact that it's paid THIS year. (Are you sure you'd rather handcuff the team with that albatross rather than have Ryan and Mac?)
3) Alfredsson didn't intend to play the last year when he signed the contract, nor did the team expect it, so when he decides to actually change his mind and play out the contract he signed instead, all of a sudden the team owes him more money? (Does this happen anywhere in the real world??)
The Senators were happy to negotiate a fair contract for Alfie for this year, but it's ridiculous to think that they would do that AND pay for last year as well.
Let the man go, he's a hockey payer, and was a good citizen. He chose to go elsewhere for more money as players usually do. I for one am glad that management doesn't get all caught up in having to offer contracts based on the current year and compensation for previous years.... Imagine how messy that could be?