Honest question, why are many 30+ Defensemen struggling

Tairy Greene

Registered User
Feb 2, 2020
786
651
I think weve seen a similar percentage of good forwards fall off a cliff in their 30s. Its becoming a young mans league and weaknesses are exposed a little more on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slapKing

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,223
15,806
Tokyo, Japan
It's an interesting question. I had not noticed that veteran D were struggling more than before, but maybe the OP is onto something... Hmmm.

Well, in general, I think the NHL had veered back towards a more youth-driven game since about 2015 or so (vaguely speaking), especially in terms of star forwards who drive teams.

The period that saw the youngest line-ups of starters and stars was probably the early-mid-1980s, which -- not coincidentally -- was a high-scoring period. Young guys vs. young guys tends to result in less defence and more scoring. And more scoring means defensemen look worse.

So, perhaps, it's just a matter of slightly slower (read: older) D-men struggling more with the young, super-fast players of today.

(That said, a 36-year-old won the Norris in 2019, and an almost-44-year-old is still getting nearly 20 minutes per game today.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: slapKing

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,397
6,999
Giordano is a bad example. He had his best year at 35. Burns had his best years in his 30s as well. Chara and Keith both good into their 30s.

I feel like the current generation just isn't as good as the couple of last eras of guys like Bourque, Lidstrom, Pronger, Coffey, Chelios, etc.

Those guys won multiple Norris's. Pronger won a Hart.

I think another part of it, is that there is a smaller gap between the best and the worst players now. Once salaries exploded in the 90's hockey stopped being as much of a kid's game and more of a hockey player assembly plant.

You now see kids funneled into super elite programs at the age of 8-9 where they play hockey and work on hockey development year round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slapKing

TkachukMyAho

Registered User
Apr 13, 2007
1,081
624
I think the reality of this is the fact that when you're competitive, you're 4 defenseman and 2 others to help you get a break. Top forwards receive less ice time than top defenseman. Especially outside of the top 3 forwards. Defense takes a lot of damage eating pucks, quick pivots, misdirections and all the vulnerable corner positions (retrieving pucks with an attacking forward).

Signed,

Currently below bottom level beer league former defenseman
 

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,464
NYC
When I turned 30, I abruptly declined physically also. And I play a defensive position in my rec league sport. It's just a magic number. I felt like a world-beater at 27, but when I hit 30, plunk.

Hell one of my last days as a 29 year old I played a full 40 minute game without a single shift off because our team was missing a few players. I was like Seth Jones in that 5OT game.

And then on my birthday I woke up and I could barely run a mile without almost collapsing.

I think a better question for this thread is why is the prime of most players getting younger and younger with each generation?
 

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
When I turned 30, I abruptly declined physically also. And I play a defensive position in my rec league sport. It's just a magic number. I felt like a world-beater at 27, but when I hit 30, plunk.
I'm 33 and feel better than ever. If you avoid injuries and take proper care of yourself early to mid 40s are when men experience steep decline.
 

Porkleaker

Registered User
Mar 19, 2017
10,115
8,884
Onterrible
When I turned 30, I abruptly declined physically also. And I play a defensive position in my rec league sport. It's just a magic number. I felt like a world-beater at 27, but when I hit 30, plunk.

Wear and tear, especially playing hockey. A lot of the injuries add up over time and that's why players get paid the big bucks! I noticed the same thing but it was exactly when I hit 40, so I guess I got lucky lol.
 

PatrikBerglund

Registered User
May 29, 2017
4,628
2,654
This is something I have been thinking about. When compared to previous generation of defensemen, the current 30+ dmen are either struggling, having bad years, or complete fallen off the cliff.

For guys like lidstrom, bourque, pronger, stevens, pronger, macinnis, chelios, niedermayer, coffey, leetch and a few others I'm probably forgetting, they were still good when turning 30.

Granted, everyone declines at a different age, but these guys were still good up to their mid 30's at least. Most lasted until their late 30's, and a few still very good in their 40's.

So why is so many 30+ dmen are struggling today?

The pace of the game and the speed of the individual players are much higher today, than it was only 20 years ago.

Many 30+ players who used to be able to make quick decisions withing the split second they had, now have to make them 0,1 second earlier - and can't do it.

Also, going up against the incredibly fast young players coming up, reveals their weaknessness even more.

Nick Lidstrom at age 40 would have huge trouble in today's NHL, while he was still Norris-worthy at age 40 when he was active.

The game changes and all players can't cut it.
 

Civetty

Registered User
Jan 2, 2017
408
245
It's unbelievable that ek has won the Norris twice. Guy has fallen off the cliff completely.

I mean that is what injuries do. Not only do you have to fight against your physical disablities, but you also have to fight against the demons inside of your head of knowing you don't performing as well. People may laugh and joke about EK etc, but I honestly just find it sad.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,633
29,335
those guys are the exception not the rule. That’s what makes them all special and great and why they stand out.

The names OP mentioned are a major exception .. they were just freaks lol

The OP's list are exceptional players compared to regular D-men, sure. But it's also just a list of the best D-men from a whole generation. From Langway in 1984 until Chara in 2009, every Norris winner was on OP's list except for Rod Blake, who was also great in his 30s. Elite D-men in that era did maintain an astonishingly elite level well into their 30s.

If you look at the Norris winners since then, some have aged wonderfully but you also have Karlsson, Subban, and Doughty. All three are crap as they enter their 30s.
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,032
1,016
The pace of the game and the speed of the individual players are much higher today, than it was only 20 years ago.

Many 30+ players who used to be able to make quick decisions withing the split second they had, now have to make them 0,1 second earlier - and can't do it.

Also, going up against the incredibly fast young players coming up, reveals their weaknessness even more.

Nick Lidstrom at age 40 would have huge trouble in today's NHL, while he was still Norris-worthy at age 40 when he was active.

The game changes and all players can't cut it.

This is based on some weird theory you have in your head honestly. Lidstrom would challenge for Norris at 40 in todays NHL just like he did 10 years ago
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
15,805
5,066
Partly, the type of game is the reason. Many of the greats you listed played precise, controlled hockey, facilitating the offense. Players like Karlsson and Doughty are rovers, jumping in and igniting the offense.

The latter sale is more reliant on physical tools and is more taxing.
 

teravaineSAROS

Registered User
Jul 29, 2015
3,814
1,482
It's interesting how in the UFC becoming a champion at around 30 is the norm. My guess is that the wear & tear hockey players go through makes your body break down sooner.

Another thing I've noticed is that hockey has exploded as far as talent goes. A lot of countries are producing more talent than ever like Sweden (quantity wise), Finland, Switzerland, USA and Germany. If a league becomes more competitive you're just not gonna stand out as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slapKing

Willy Styles

Registered User
Nov 5, 2014
1,914
315
York Region
Not sure which ones are struggling?

Brodie and Bogosian have been great for the Leafs, in the past Ron Hainsey was very good late in his 30s on the Leafs.

Good defensemen should be solid till mid 30 at the minimum
 

SotasicA

Registered User
Aug 25, 2014
8,489
6,404
It's normal. Back in the 70's and 80's, being thirty was already very old. Players were younger than today, and plenty of teenagers on all teams. You couldn't really keep up past 30.

Then at some point in the 90's, 35 became the new 30. Players played longer, teams were older. And that went on for a good 25 years. A whole generation. Now it's getting back to the old normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slapKing

Willy Styles

Registered User
Nov 5, 2014
1,914
315
York Region
And to add to my point the parity in the league makes it seem like really good defensemen aren't very good. Like for example, if Doughty or Duncan Keith were still on very good contender level teams like the guys listed in OP they would stand out more
Being a good defensemen is more cerebral and timing based, no reason why guys shouldn't be able to play till like 34 if they are actually a world class level defenseman, Karlsson being the exception because of his injuries
 

Tobias Kahun

Registered User
Oct 3, 2017
42,333
51,414
When I turned 30, I abruptly declined physically also. And I play a defensive position in my rec league sport. It's just a magic number. I felt like a world-beater at 27, but when I hit 30, plunk.
I just turned 30, all down hill from here.
 

dlawong

Registered User
Nov 24, 2011
2,418
527
Vancouver, Canada
Besides being slow down due to the accumulated effects from multiple injuries, could the decline of on ice performance of these D also due to a shift in priorities when they turn 30 and thus less focused on their individual game performance? Maybe some D's over 30 started to spent more time with their family and become more invested in improving their finance and investment and may also tried avoid bad injuries in late stage of their career in order to prolong their pro life and still able to retire healthy. Also they may lose their in game focus due to being more engaged in off ice activities such as community and political events. As a forward you just can't get away with taking the game easy or have too many nights off because once you stop contributing to the scoring you will be out of the pro league real soon as it is much faster to develop forwards than defenseman. Also by nature playing defense position is less exciting than playing offense and over the career one may just lose the passion for the game. Playoff is a different beast though. It may bring back that excitement and renew their passion.

I recalled that when one of my friends in the old days turned 30, he called me up suddenly revealing he is depressed as he just realized that he has not got to where he really wants to be. I think when a man turns 30, many of them kinds woke up and see their life differently.

Of course there will be some exceptions as some men do mature quite early and take their life real seriously at an younger age and there are those who are possessive at always being the best. Pro athletes in general are more mature as well as they do leave home much earlier.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad