Holland/Wright the Worst Drafting Duo of the Century?

Lacaar

Registered User
Jan 25, 2012
4,098
1,257
Edmonton
The Oilers incredibly bad drafting outside of lottery picks basically since the beginning of the Decade of Darkness is why they haven't already won the cup with McDavid.

It's true. The Oilers are dogshit drafters and have been for decades.

I have no explanation why. Maybe they don't spend in that area.

As of Today the Oilers have 3 players on the team that weren't drafted top ten. Ok there's a fine line where we want to draw as Bouchard was drafted 10th. And they don't really move the dial at all.

That leaves
1. Ryan Mcleod - very fast player that does not physically engage with absolutely no consistency. He's good for a bit and non existent for stretches.

2. Dylan Holloway - That player that looks good and accomplishes nothing of significance. Hasn't improved since his first day in the NHL for the most part.

3. Vincent Desharnais - A fan favorite. We love his approach to the game, his compete and work ethic. But the reality is he's a 6th d-man who is 27 years old. He's still improving in steps though.

That's it. Well Stuart Skinner is a good pick but I feel goalies are just a different song and dance all together. That and this is the first drafted goalie that has pissed a drop for the team in years? decades?

I think it will be the number 1 reason if they don't win a cup. They can't find players beyond the first 10 picks that really move the needle for them. They've got two players treading water and one that can't stay in the pool.

Being on this board for years I used to love reading and hoping for Oiler draft picks. But over the decades I've become jaded and accept that this team is a f***ing disaster at the draft floor.

My only hope is they know it as well. Hence all the the internal stuff that went down last summer. Then again they've done this over and over again. Fire staff... draft shit.. repeat.
 

Zarzh

Registered User
Jun 30, 2015
791
60
Sakic is the worst and it's not close. At most you can give him credit for not passing on the consensus picks in Makar/Rantanen.
 

Toene

Y'en aura pas de facile
Nov 17, 2014
4,958
4,927
Habs scouting is even worst. Check from 2008-2021.
No, it's not. It's bad, but not Holland-bad. Active NHLers, since 2014, without counting '22 and '23 :
Juulsen, Sergachev, Evans, Poehling. Kotkaniemi, Ylonen, Struble, Harris, Caufield, Pezzetta, RHP, Guhle
Off the top of my head.

And a bunch of guys from 2019 to 2023 that are promising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realgud

IWantSakicAsMyGM

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
9,782
3,986
Colorado
Sakic is the worst and it's not close. At most you can give him credit for not passing on the consensus picks in Makar/Rantanen.

During his 9 years as GM, he picked 3 times in the top 5 and got two of the top 3 players in the NHL today, plus Byram. And he also made the single best 10 OA pick since Selanne in 1988. I agree he hasn't done much beyond those 4 guys, but there's teams out there that would kill to have drafted any single one of them, let alone all 4.
 

Zarzh

Registered User
Jun 30, 2015
791
60
During his 9 years as GM, he picked 3 times in the top 5 and got two of the top 3 players in the NHL today, plus Byram. And he also made the single best 10 OA pick since Selanne in 1988. I agree he hasn't done much beyond those 4 guys, but there's teams out there that would kill to have drafted any single one of them, let alone all 4.
I don't think he deserves credit for making the consensus pick when a 10 year old would have made the same pick.
 

IWantSakicAsMyGM

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
9,782
3,986
Colorado
I don't think he deserves credit for making the consensus pick when a 10 year old would have made the same pick.

I think an empty net goal still counts the same as any other goal. It might be easier, but you still need to puck the puck in the net. A truly bad GM would have found a way to Stefan those tap ins.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
2,920
3,294
What Pastrnak was still on the board?

Pasta was 22 on McKenzie's list, 25 on Button's, 23 on THN's, 33 on ISS, 17 on HockeyProspect, and 25th on McKeen's list.

There's plenty to criticize Holland for. Picking a stud (Larkin) who developed to be better than his draft position over an even better player (Pasta) who was ranked well below Detroit's pick range is not one of them.

If Pasta was ranked in the teens and Holland blew that pick on a shit player, sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Wings

zar

Bleed Blue
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2010
7,165
6,728
Edmonton AB
Their pro scouting is no better… FML!

Actually, might be worse.

The Oilers have probably had the worst drafting in the league for the past 30 years.

Holland has made it worse.
40 years. They had arguably the best drafting ever during their first few years in the league, best back to back draft classes without a doubt, then they have absolutely shit the bed. Just brutal.
 

Lolonegoal

Registered User
Jan 25, 2012
2,340
3,103
Habs scouting is even worst. Check from 2008-2021.
Bergevin/Timmins is unrivalled

Doesn't seem comparable:

Gallagher (147th overall) - 731 GP, 413 pts
Beaulieu (17th overall) - 471 GP, 98 pts
Hudon (122th overall) - 134 GP, 41 pts
Galchenyuk (3rd overall) - 654 GP, 354 pts
Lehkonen (55th overall) - 504 GP, 229 pts
Evans (207th overall) - 247 GP, 84 points
Segachev (9th overall) - 475 GP, 257 points
Mete (100th overall) 248 GP, 45 pts
Pezzetta (160th overall) 158 GP, 36 points
Poehling (25th overall) 196 GP, 56 points
Primeau (199th overall) 35 GP, likely Habs back-up for the next few years
Kotkaniemi (3rd overall) 302 GP, 155 pts
Ylonen (35th overall) 101 GP, 28 pts
Romanov (38th overall) 268 GP, 55 pts
Harris (71th overall) 112 GP, 26 pts

So there's quiet a few of late round steals there. Not stars, but getting a guy like Evans or Gallagher late is a huge win. Their big mistakes are their high picks, but they were unforunate to pick high when they did. Sure they could have picked Brady instead of KK, but the 5th and 6th picks were Hayton and Zadina, and the surprise was that they didn't pick Zadina, not Thachuk. Galchenyuk is still the 5th highest scoring player from that draft, he was the consensus pick and the player drafted after him was Griffin Reinhart. I wouldn't really attribute these too too much to scouting errors.

Then of course, poor asset management. They traded away the good picks, so we don't associate them much with the team. But Sergachev and Romanov are great defenseman and Lehkonen is flourishing in Colorado. At least they turned Romanov into Dach. But most significantly, other than the flops on the top 3 players, they were drafting pretty late in the 1st because the team was making the playoffs. They drafted in the top 16 three times during that time period, and picked in the top 25 six times over a decade.

You also handpicked a time frame immediately after they drafted Subban, Pacioretty and McDonagh in one year, and a year prior to drafting Caufield and other roster players in Struble, Harvey-Pinard and Guhle and Roy, and some other prospects that are likely to be NHLers like Mailloux and Farrell. Same scouting team and management, so no other reason why to do that other than make your point look better. Definitely not worse than Holland.
 

Byron Bitz

Registered User
Apr 6, 2010
7,549
3,890
Doesn't seem comparable:

Gallagher (147th overall) - 731 GP, 413 pts
Beaulieu (17th overall) - 471 GP, 98 pts
Hudon (122th overall) - 134 GP, 41 pts
Galchenyuk (3rd overall) - 654 GP, 354 pts
Lehkonen (55th overall) - 504 GP, 229 pts
Evans (207th overall) - 247 GP, 84 points
Segachev (9th overall) - 475 GP, 257 points
Mete (100th overall) 248 GP, 45 pts
Pezzetta (160th overall) 158 GP, 36 points
Poehling (25th overall) 196 GP, 56 points
Primeau (199th overall) 35 GP, likely Habs back-up for the next few years
Kotkaniemi (3rd overall) 302 GP, 155 pts
Ylonen (35th overall) 101 GP, 28 pts
Romanov (38th overall) 268 GP, 55 pts
Harris (71th overall) 112 GP, 26 pts

So there's quiet a few of late round steals there. Not stars, but getting a guy like Evans or Gallagher late is a huge win. Their big mistakes are their high picks, but they were unforunate to pick high when they did. Sure they could have picked Brady instead of KK, but the 5th and 6th picks were Hayton and Zadina, and the surprise was that they didn't pick Zadina, not Thachuk. Galchenyuk is still the 5th highest scoring player from that draft, he was the consensus pick and the player drafted after him was Griffin Reinhart. I wouldn't really attribute these too too much to scouting errors.

Then of course, poor asset management. They traded away the good picks, so we don't associate them much with the team. But Sergachev and Romanov are great defenseman and Lehkonen is flourishing in Colorado. At least they turned Romanov into Dach. But most significantly, other than the flops on the top 3 players, they were drafting pretty late in the 1st because the team was making the playoffs. They drafted in the top 16 three times during that time period, and picked in the top 25 six times over a decade.

You also handpicked a time frame immediately after they drafted Subban, Pacioretty and McDonagh in one year, and a year prior to drafting Caufield and other roster players in Struble, Harvey-Pinard and Guhle and Roy, and some other prospects that are likely to be NHLers like Mailloux and Farrell. Same scouting team and management, so no other reason why to do that other than make your point look better. Definitely not worse than Holland.
Galchenyuk was a bad pick. Rielly and Forsberg were still on the board
 

Lolonegoal

Registered User
Jan 25, 2012
2,340
3,103
Galchenyuk was a bad pick. Rielly and Forsberg were still on the board
Forsberg was picked 8 picks later at 11th. There was no world where they were taking him. McKenzie also had Reilley at 8th. A lot of people were surprised he was taken over Dumba.
 

logan5

Registered User
May 24, 2011
6,083
4,226
Vancouver - Mt. Pleasant
Benning and whoever drafted Virtanen at #6 overall in 2014 and Juolevi at #5 overall in 2016. Two big busts that make (or made) him the worst drafter in the league.
 

GrumpyKoala

Registered User
Aug 11, 2020
2,896
3,102
The odds at drafting players that get to play at the nhl level is quite lower than most of us think they are.

Less than 25% of all second rounder play a single game.
Less than 12% of all third rounder see any nhl time.

I don't know the stats by heart for playing a season or more but they are quite abysmal
 

GrumpyKoala

Registered User
Aug 11, 2020
2,896
3,102
No, it's not. It's bad, but not Holland-bad. Active NHLers, since 2014, without counting '22 and '23 :
Juulsen, Sergachev, Evans, Poehling. Kotkaniemi, Ylonen, Struble, Harris, Caufield, Pezzetta, RHP, Guhle
Off the top of my head.

And a bunch of guys from 2019 to 2023 that are promising.

Not to disagree with the initial statement specifically but at least half if not 2/3 of thoses guys wouldn't had make it past training camp if drafted by the Oilers in the Holland era

Ok maybe not half - 2/3 but you get the essence.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad