LTIR
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2013
- 26,006
- 13,025
If by pekka you mean the guys in stripes then you are correct.Preds didn't deserve to win. Pekka stole that one.
If by pekka you mean the guys in stripes then you are correct.Preds didn't deserve to win. Pekka stole that one.
Based on?If by pekka you mean the guys in stripes then you are correct.
Oilers like to pass the puck in the net.. we are shitty that wayMcDavid needs to stop passing. If he activated his shot he could be better than he already is. Or the Oilers need to find him someone who can finish those passes he was putting straight into the crease.
McDavid needs to stop passing. If he activated his shot he could be better than he already is. Or the Oilers need to find him someone who can finish those passes he was putting straight into the crease. He was wiring them straight through the Preds - someone has to get a stick on that.
Based on atleast 5 pps they did not give oilers.. weak calls in Oilers... Hartnell nutjob is 5min major worthy if it was an OilerBased on?
gotta love how they take back the Oilers goal because Kharia's toe might have been 1 mm off the ice but they gave this to Nashville last year vs Edmonton
gotta love how they take back the Oilers goal because Kharia's toe might have been 1 mm off the ice but they gave this to Nashville last year vs Edmonton
gotta love how they take back the Oilers goal because Kharia's toe might have been 1 mm off the ice but they gave this to Nashville last year vs Edmonton
Love it when a player who is "offside" decides the fate of the game even though his skate being a cm above the ice had no impact what so ever on the play. I thought the NHL was trying to find ways to increase scoring. They make the game harder to understand, less exciting and less marketable.
Consistent isn't exactly the word I'd use given the video posted above.Yeah we Preds fans have fussed about this rule more than anyone probably. It's a crap rule but it is one they have been very consistent with, which is oddly surprising from the NHL.
Well to claim Pekka was the difference would be incorrect as well.. Oilers shots were straight forward saves..You won't find a single post from me about the merits of a call/non-call. Ever. I do engage in posts in response to folks who do though.
Guess its time to tank for us..Oilers deserved at least 1 point tonight. Really don't like these challenges.
Well to claim Pekka was the difference would be incorrect as well.. Oilers shots were straight forward saves..
I've seen the same call made since ours in the playoffs 4 or 5 times. One time doesn't mean they haven't been fairly consistent with the call.Consistent isn't exactly the word I'd use given the video posted above.
This isn't really news to anyone. Their season was done the moment they decided to come out of the Christmas break and lay a brick.I mean, EDM's gotta be out of it now, regardless if McDavid does McDavid things.
SportsClubStats has them at 34% to make the playoffs if they go 25-10-4
Sure it does. Consistency would be having the same standard on every play, especially with video replay. Consistency is a little more lenient in real time, but on video replay to be consistent you should be right 100% of the time.I've seen the same call made since ours in playoffs 4 or 5 times. One time doesn't mean they have been fairly consistent with the call.
This isn't really news to anyone. Their season was done the moment they decided to come out of the Christmas break and lay a brick.
No you really don't. It just means you consistently make the same call the majority of the time. 100% isn't consistency, that would be perfection.Sure it does. Consistency would be having the same standard on every play, especially with video replay. Consistency is a little more lenient in real time, but on video replay to be consistent you should be right 100% of the time.
Lol yeah you're right that McDavid breakaway was a routine save