GDT: HFBoards GDT | 1/7/19

[La Masse]

This is coming back

 

[Fatty McLardy]

that looks offsides.

 

[Palio]

If the league doesn’t have another angle that’s a trash call. You can’t see the puck

 

[bdub24]

The Arizona kid doesn't understand the puck needs to be on the other side of the blue line I guess.

 

[Paris in Flames]

I don't like that it's being used for fraction of an inch type shit like this but hey. It is what it is.

 

[Paris in Flames]

The Arizona kid doesn't understand the puck needs to be on the other side of the blue line I guess.

It...wasn't Matthews who went into the zone early though.....

 

[TheBeastCoast]

I hate offside review lol

 

[The Macho King]

I hate offside review lol

Worst rule in the sport.

 

[La Masse]

Its such a stupid rule

 

[hatterson]

This is what everyone wanted. Because a player was 2 inches offside 18 seconds before the goal, it should be called back because that seems like a good idea.

 

[Nizdizzle]

I'm excited if Matthews scores another to see him indicate onsite in a goal celly.

 

[Bounces R Way]

Worst rule in sports.

FTFY

 

[bdub24]

It's not like it's an isolated village in the middle of nowhere. It's more like a suburb of a town, or a neighborhood. Where Lindholm and Arvidsson come from has a population of about 50,000.

Oh. Tronna intermission guys were sayin they came from a little place

 

[Kelly]

....it was offside though, doesn't matter if it's an inch or three feet.

Im fine with the offside rule because it's black and white, the goalie interference shit is garbage though.

 

[Saitama]

I wish they would change it to a non-reviewable "close enough" rule, where they only call blatant offsides. Too many good goals called off due to this stuff.

 

[La Masse]

This is what everyone wanted. Because a player was 2 inches offside 18 seconds before the goal, it should be called back because that seems like a good idea.

This lol.

 

[The Macho King]

....it was offside though, doesn't matter if it's an inch or three feet.

Im fine with the offside rule because it's black and white, the goalie interference **** is garbage though.

This logic is stupid. "I'm fine with the death penalty for speeding, because 56 is more than 55."

Objective =/= good.

 

[Hennessy]

Oh. Tronna intermission guys apwere sayin they came from a little place

If you only take the population of that one locality it's 500 people. But that's like saying someone from Paramount, California comes from a town of however big Paramount is right now, ignoring that it's part of Los Angeles.

 

[Taro Tsujimoto]

Honestly, they should tweak they rule so a team can only challenge for offsides if the goal was scored within ~10 seconds of the zone entry.

 

[Backhandbeauty]

This is what everyone wanted. Because a player was 2 inches offside 18 seconds before the goal, it should be called back because that seems like a good idea.

No it most certainly is not what everyone wanted.

 

[hatterson]

I wish they would change it to a non-reviewable "close enough" rule, where they only call blatant offsides. Too many good goals called off due to this stuff.

It's a pretty easy change to make. Linesmen get 2 looks at the replay at full speed. If they can't 100% tell it's offside based on those 2 replays, the call on the ice stands.

If, in 3 looks at the play (live, plus 2 replays) you can't be 100% sure it's offside, than it's too close to have a real bearing on how players reacted and thus the goal should count.

That lets you overturn the absurd mistakes but prevents the millimeter plays that absolutely everyone hates.

 

[bdub24]

If you only take the population of that one locality it's 500 people. But that's like saying someone from Paramount, California comes from a town of however big Paramount is right now, ignoring that it's part of Los Angeles.

Gotcha. Makes perfect sense! Thanks for clarifying!

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

This logic is stupid. "I'm fine with the death penalty for speeding, because 56 is more than 55."

Objective =/= good.

yeah, it does more harm than good

 

[Eat The Rich]

This logic is stupid. "I'm fine with the death penalty for speeding, because 56 is more than 55."

Objective =/= good.

What does the NHL know about logic?

The same league which puts goalies' safety at risk in order to increase scoring also gives coaches multiple tools to decrease it at the same time.

 

[Kelly]

This logic is stupid. "I'm fine with the death penalty for speeding, because 56 is more than 55."

Objective =/= good.

Not as stupid as your comparable

Where do you draw the line?

You don't, it's a black and white call, keep it simple, or don't have reviewable calls... Which in this day and age, is stupid.

 

[POVERTY]

There should be a time threshold between the missed offside call and the goal which negates an overturn