ChefTO
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2010
- 408
- 0
How is that a Feasteresque move? Taking Lazar at 7 is in no way comparable to taking Jankowski at 19. Lazar is a player who has been on the top 10 radar for a while now and is a proven performer at the highest of Junior levels while Jankowski was all potential with absolutely no proven background.
Now, Lazar would be a bit of a reach at 7 for sure but it's not THAT outlandish. He's borderline top 10 on several lists and some of Bobby Mac's polled scouts had him in the top 10. I'm sure that he'll continue to climb as he performs well against top competition like Seth Jones.
Also the fact that he's everything we need in a player and currently don't have.
I would prefer that they trade back a bit if Lindholm and Monahan are gone, try to gain an asset and take Lazar at around 10 or 11 but taking him at 7 is in no way a Feasteresque reach.
I'm not so keen on Nichushkin. I'm not a fan of players who lack hockey sense and don't utilize their teammates. His physical gifts are immense and we could use a physical force like him in the top 6 but i think we need real "hockey players" like Monahan and Lazar, guys who are real pros and who are jacks of all trades. Those are the guys that you win cups with.
Well said,
I'd like to trade down if Monahan is gone... or somehow acquire an extra pick to grab Lazar...