i mean, it really shouldn't be in terms of hockey, but it is in terms of posters.Seattle on a warpath up 17-5 I think.
We going all the way fellas
Same, Considering my match up would literally be tied with my wife's vote.Fair. JM made it a rule in the new one but it's not here, although I'd hope the other sets of siblings would do something similar.
their vote counts just as much as ours, thoughSome people have #4-#6 dmen on their top pair for whatever reason
putting aside my love of inflammatory comments, posturing and lol'ing
i do appreciate it when i hear things like "that chart doesn't put enough importance on defensive play", which i have since heard from a few people, so i've addressed that. it had a ripple effect as did a couple other minor edits.
los angeles kings make more sense now
all i have to do is post another random list, change up a couple things, and call it proprietary to someone else. all proprietary means is that it's owned by someone. so what?
please clarify comparison as you used the same comparativeMore of an accomplishment to draft a top team according to pandascore/ehm
Then draft a top team based on pandascore/ehm criteria
Obviously if I made goatscorer my team would score #1 but that's expected
Same, Considering my match up would literally be tied with my wife's vote.
Going to leave my opinions on the results so far to myself.
please clarify comparison as you used the same comparative
that's what i get for skimming“It’s more impressive to draft a team that ranks highly in PandaScores without using the list than with using the list”
Which is an obvious statement
please clarify comparison as you used the same comparative
i skimmed your post, thought you meant to write that it was more impressive to score well with your proprietary criteria than mine but accidentally wrote mine twiceIf you draft based off of EA score and run a sim, is it really impressive if you score the highest?
If you draft based off your own whims instead of bias and rank high on ehm, ea and pandascore tm, that's a better indicator of drafting abilities
i skimmed your post, thought you meant to write that it was more impressive to score well with your proprietary criteria than mine but accidentally wrote mine twice
mine also have nothing to do with ehm, thanks
los angeles kings make more sense now
i still don't draft purely on pandascores btw, but they're a good guide
i am finding that lots of good drafting here is premised on being able to properly predict in what round a player will go in order to maximize value, so the more of these you've done, the better you'll be able to do that
e.g. stastny in the 5th was unprecedented until this game, and i had only played three games prior so it had not been reasonable to expect him to go when he did. for next game, it will be reasonable