You have to put records into context, sure. All games today end in a win or a loss, but there has never been more artificial parity in the league either, with cap hits, etc.
Meanwhile a goalie from the earlier eras had to be really good at hockey and play on a dynasty team to reach longevity records.
Just as Orr and Gretzky should have their records put into context. There were light years between a 1st liner and a 4th liner in that age, defensemen didn't know how to defend - or skate - and goalies weren't that good at stopping pucks. Talent was a much more prevalent trait the earlier you look, which gave them an advantage that is much smaller for supreme talents in the game today.
Meanwhile the superstars today have to try to put up records in an era where even 4th liners are very good hockey players, know how to skate and defend and are a legitimate threat. While they don't have to worry about some lumberjack 4th liner swinging a stick at their head or driving their head through the glass, they still have to watch out for heavy hitters and cheap shots.
All in all, players from different eras shouldn't be compared that much, beause they're not comparable. Still, quite a feat from Lundqvist, he has played on a top salary cap team, sure, but the franchise hasn't exactly spent it well and hasn't been a powerhouse for a clear majority of the years Lundqvist has played for them.