PatriceBergeronFan
Registered User
I think I saw it when it happened. I can't say here what I think about Cooke. But he will get his, someday.
I think I saw it when it happened. I can't say here what I think about Cooke. But he will get his, someday.
None of us can.
It took awhile for the NHL to even consider him a repeat offender because he was never cited for this.
Just watched both the nesn clip (for the first time in a while), and then the pittsburgh version. Oh jeez that was hard to watch...the way his hands were moving. Also got caught up momentarily and forgot the headshot rule change came later... loathe the fact that Cooke wasn't immediately thrown out of the game, and we had to look at his face the whole time as they were getting the stretcher out.
Would like to hear what Bergeron was saying to Cooke and then Crosby there.
I honestly don't have anything against the Minnesota Wild, but as long as they employ Cooke, I never ever want to see them make the playoffs, where he can do more of his maiming and ending of careers.
10 days later this happened
10 days later this happened
Really don't know who saw what - supposedly, Ryder was the only one - but the lack of response was shameful & really upset me at the time. Guess you can't act without knowing what happened, but surely everyone in the NHL knew the kind of "player" Cooke was.
It should have been a team wide ass kicking next game. Instead, it was an antiseptic, "Let's move on, shall we?" thing from our designated pugilist. Still feel it was pathetic.
Going to go watch that. Then I'm going to watch the far more satisfying Dallas & MTL beat downs.
Good times.
The NHL should've kicked Cooke out of the league after that blatant head shot, but there wasn't even a freakin' penalty called on the play, and that piece of **** is STILL playing.
#unbelievable
Really don't know who saw what - supposedly, Ryder was the only one - but the lack of response was shameful & really upset me at the time. Guess you can't act without knowing what happened, but surely everyone in the NHL knew the kind of "player" Cooke was.
It should have been a team wide ass kicking next game. Instead, it was an antiseptic, "Let's move on, shall we?" thing from our designated pugilist. Still feel it was pathetic.
Going to go watch that. Then I'm going to watch the far more satisfying Dallas & MTL beat downs.
Good times.
I'll never forget that assault (not a hit) - it's burned into my brain, and yes, Ryder was the only Bruin behind the play, and the only witness. Everyone else was down ice, and the guys on the bench were looking down ice as well, following the puck.
It's just too bizarre that it was Ryder of all people, because, as I've said before, Cooke could have assaulted Ryder's mother in the same manner and Ryder would have done nothing. It's just not his nature. It's like expecting a guppy to be a shark.
He actually did go after Cooke and shove him a bit, which unsurprisingly startled Lucic, who began to react to the pushing/shoving, but then turned around and saw Savard, and I can't say as I blame anyone at that moment for just forgetting everything else and concentrating on Savvy.
Meanwhile, we at home see replay after replay on TV. But the game was in Pittsburgh. There's no way in hell they replayed that on the big screen.
Cooke should have gotten a MASSIVE suspension. The "it's not a penalty" malarkey is nothing but a truckload of horse****. There IS a penalty on the books - intent to injure. The NHL should have whacked Cooke over the head with that rule and sat him on his *** for the rest of the season, including the playoffs. And then kicked him out of the league for his next infraction.
Sure, an absolute beatdown of Cooke by Thornton would have been satisfying (and Shawn I know tried, but sometimes fights don't go the way you want - Cooke wasn't just going to stand there and let his brains be beat in), but in the end, it wasn't going to bring Savard back, and it wasn't going to deter Cooke. The only thing that hurts a psychopath like that is getting hit in the wallet. It shouldn't be up to the players to protect themselves from guys like that, but the league. The NHL has the real power, and they shouldn't be afraid to use it.
Meanwhile, Savvy will always be a Bruin. I know he feels that way, and I'm glad he does.
I'll never forget that assault (not a hit) - it's burned into my brain, and yes, Ryder was the only Bruin behind the play, and the only witness. Everyone else was down ice, and the guys on the bench were looking down ice as well, following the puck.
It's just too bizarre that it was Ryder of all people, because, as I've said before, Cooke could have assaulted Ryder's mother in the same manner and Ryder would have done nothing. It's just not his nature. It's like expecting a guppy to be a shark.
He actually did go after Cooke and shove him a bit, which unsurprisingly startled Lucic, who began to react to the pushing/shoving, but then turned around and saw Savard, and I can't say as I blame anyone at that moment for just forgetting everything else and concentrating on Savvy.
Meanwhile, we at home see replay after replay on TV. But the game was in Pittsburgh. There's no way in hell they replayed that on the big screen.
Cooke should have gotten a MASSIVE suspension. The "it's not a penalty" malarkey is nothing but a truckload of horse****. There IS a penalty on the books - intent to injure. The NHL should have whacked Cooke over the head with that rule and sat him on his *** for the rest of the season, including the playoffs. And then kicked him out of the league for his next infraction.
Sure, an absolute beatdown of Cooke by Thornton would have been satisfying (and Shawn I know tried, but sometimes fights don't go the way you want - Cooke wasn't just going to stand there and let his brains be beat in), but in the end, it wasn't going to bring Savard back, and it wasn't going to deter Cooke. The only thing that hurts a psychopath like that is getting hit in the wallet. It shouldn't be up to the players to protect themselves from guys like that, but the league. The NHL has the real power, and they shouldn't be afraid to use it.
Meanwhile, Savvy will always be a Bruin. I know he feels that way, and I'm glad he does.
I'll never forget that assault (not a hit) - it's burned into my brain, and yes, Ryder was the only Bruin behind the play, and the only witness. Everyone else was down ice, and the guys on the bench were looking down ice as well, following the puck.
It's just too bizarre that it was Ryder of all people, because, as I've said before, Cooke could have assaulted Ryder's mother in the same manner and Ryder would have done nothing. It's just not his nature. It's like expecting a guppy to be a shark.
He actually did go after Cooke and shove him a bit, which unsurprisingly startled Lucic, who began to react to the pushing/shoving, but then turned around and saw Savard, and I can't say as I blame anyone at that moment for just forgetting everything else and concentrating on Savvy.
Meanwhile, we at home see replay after replay on TV. But the game was in Pittsburgh. There's no way in hell they replayed that on the big screen.
Cooke should have gotten a MASSIVE suspension. The "it's not a penalty" malarkey is nothing but a truckload of horse****. There IS a penalty on the books - intent to injure. The NHL should have whacked Cooke over the head with that rule and sat him on his *** for the rest of the season, including the playoffs. And then kicked him out of the league for his next infraction.
Sure, an absolute beatdown of Cooke by Thornton would have been satisfying (and Shawn I know tried, but sometimes fights don't go the way you want - Cooke wasn't just going to stand there and let his brains be beat in), but in the end, it wasn't going to bring Savard back, and it wasn't going to deter Cooke. The only thing that hurts a psychopath like that is getting hit in the wallet. It shouldn't be up to the players to protect themselves from guys like that, but the league. The NHL has the real power, and they shouldn't be afraid to use it.
Meanwhile, Savvy will always be a Bruin. I know he feels that way, and I'm glad he does.
The only way this crap will end is the NHL has to work it out with the NHLPA that a player can remain suspended until the injured player is cleared to play again.
I know what you mean, but the problem with that method of discipline is that sometimes the most deliberatley vicious hits result in little time missed, and vice versa.
Sigh. Sadly the day will come when a player dies on the ice.
I still can't believe he's only had to answer the bell once against the Bruins. They should be making him pay every time they play that ******. I wish Lucic, Chara or McQuaid were on the ice when that hit happened, back then Lucic and Chara would have went nuts.
Then again, this new Bruins team would probably sit down and have a chat with Cooke rather than actually do something.
So what would "do something" do? Bring Savard back? Obviously not. Teach Cooke a lesson? Hah. That guy has had the snot pounded out of him countless times, and it's had zero effect. He. Doesn't. Care.
The only entity that has power over Cooke is his employer (the Wild) and the NHL, because the only thing he cares about is his paycheck. Hunting him down would only result in penalties, fines or suspensions for whoever tries it.