- Jan 9, 2009
- 15,675
- 10,233
So in your simplistic view, Lindholm is better on the PP and PK but stone is better 80% of the time when it's 5 on 5 because ice time determines who's better, correct?
Not sure where you get the 80% from but lets forget it and agree to disagree.
Lindholm is a solid 200 ft player and extremely good defensively and I have no doubt that he will be one of three finalists when the Norris is awarded. He has a solid chance of winning it.
You obviously disagree which is your right. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and everyone has one. We'll see how this all plays out in June.