Strange asset management considering they did so well at the TDL...
Strange asset management considering they did so well at the TDL...
Pitlick is eligible for arbitration.
with his season, he will be awarded a decent salary increase which Montreal would be obliged to accept for 1 year.
Pitlick is eligible for arbitration.
with his season, he will be awarded a decent salary increase which Montreal would be obliged to accept for 1 year.
There is still a salary cap to respect, you know. And the Habs don't have much wiggle room, despite being in a rebuild.So keep him? What's it to a rebuilding team if a guy makes 1M too much? It's not like Armia, Byron and Gallagher aren't overpaid.
So keep him? What's it to a rebuilding team if a guy makes 1M too much? It's not like Armia, Byron and Gallagher aren't overpaid.
So keep him? What's it to a rebuilding team if a guy makes 1M too much? It's not like Armia, Byron and Gallagher aren't overpaid.
Pitlick was indeed surprisingly good for a waiver pickup. The problem seems to be that he's arbitration eligible and the Habs management doesn't want to go there because they're still kinda tight on the cap and Pitlick likely isn't the .5+ PPG player he'll be treated as by the arbitrator. It would've been nice to keep him around or at least get something for him in a trade but I'm not losing any sleep over it. He'll be an NHL regular somewhere next year though, that's for sure.What's the story on this guy? I feel like I follow hockey pretty religiously and never heard a peep about this guy until this thread. That twitter thread has habs fans shedding tears. Fan fav of some degree?
he had a good offensive season but he had a shooting % of like 20% most of the season. It won't stay.What's the story on this guy? I feel like I follow hockey pretty religiously and never heard a peep about this guy until this thread. That twitter thread has habs fans shedding tears. Fan fav of some degree?
or if a team needs a starting goalieI guess beggars can be choosers, even if you're a last place team.
he was waiver pickupStrange asset management considering they did so well at the TDL...
Hughes wouldn't have back himself into a corner like that. He must the caproom. Likely Price on LTIR or a trade coming. Petry?Yup, he was likely to get 2-2.5 M in arbitration.
The Habs have to shed 3-4 M just to be cap compliant, have a full roster and re-sign Dach and could not take the risk of waiting until possibly mid-August for a Pitlick arbitration number to come in and then have to shed significant $ when trades are rare at that point of the summer.
This is one of the consequences of being in cap hell.
Does not hurt to see as what the award would have been if they went that way. They could walk away unless the rules have changed. So if Pitlick had opted for arbitration the Habs that option. And how do you know the production was not sustainable? Anyways guess we shall see what they give Dach...Really? Pitlick was one of the prime arbitration overpay possibilities. RFA coming off a season with unsustainable production and a limited game. There likely wasn't a trade market for him and you don't want to overpay him.
Does not hurt to see as what the award would have been if they went that way. They could walk away unless the rules have changed. So if Pitlick had opted for arbitration the Habs that option. And how do you know the production was not sustainable? Anyways guess we shall see what they give Dach...
In certain circumstances a team can walk away from an arbitration award, and the player becomes a UFA. Players cannot. Only player-elected arbitration comes with walk-away rights for the team. Teams can also walk away from the second year of two-year awards, which makes the player a UFA at that time.
Does not hurt to see as what the award would have been if they went that way. They could walk away unless the rules have changed. So if Pitlick had opted for arbitration the Habs that option. And how do you know the production was not sustainable? Anyways guess we shall see what they give Dach...
In certain circumstances a team can walk away from an arbitration award, and the player becomes a UFA. Players cannot. Only player-elected arbitration comes with walk-away rights for the team. Teams can also walk away from the second year of two-year awards, which makes the player a UFA at that time.