They also drafted one last yearToday I learned there were two Pitlicks in the NHL. And they both play for the Canadiens. Their Pitlick/60 stats are off the charts.
Today I learned there were two Pitlicks in the NHL. And they both play for the Canadiens. Their Pitlick/60 stats are off the charts.
There's also that arbitration takes time - you don't know what the situation is until arbitration is done, so that cap can't be allocated anywhere else for a few weeks, just when assets are available for cheap.I think the problem is the arbitration rights, not the QO itself.
15 goals 37 points in 66 games could get a lot of money from an arbitrator.
There's also that arbitration takes time - you don't know what the situation is until arbitration is done, so that cap can't be allocated anywhere else for a few weeks, just when assets are available for cheap.
I think the problem is the arbitration rights, not the QO itself.
15 goals 37 points in 66 games could get a lot of money from an arbitrator.
It is true that Rem's point totals could lead to him getting $2M+, and that would not be ideal for our team makeup. But more than just a financial issue, I believe that not qualifying Rem Pitlick is also a way by management to show him respect by allowing him to choose which team he wants to sign with as a UFA.
With the season he's just had many teams will be knocking on his door and offering Pitlick a contract, and though those contracts won't be too rich by NHL standards he'll be able to pick and choose where he goes and should still make more than league minimum.
Rem Pitlick could very well be this year's Michael Bunting.
It is true that Rem's point totals could lead to him getting $2M+, and that would not be ideal for our team makeup. But more than just a financial issue, I believe that not qualifying Rem Pitlick is also a way by management to show him respect by allowing him to choose which team he wants to sign with as a UFA.
With the season he's just had many teams will be knocking on his door and offering Pitlick a contract, and though those contracts won't be too rich by NHL standards he'll be able to pick and choose where he goes and should still make more than league minimum.
Rem Pitlick could very well be this year's Michael Bunting.
That's too confusing. From now on, you'll have to differentiate them as Pitlick, Picky and Pitlique so the folks at home can keep up.There are 3 Pitlicks in total, all 3 with the habs.
...2 more to go
It is true that Rem's point totals could lead to him getting $2M+, and that would not be ideal for our team makeup. But more than just a financial issue, I believe that not qualifying Rem Pitlick is also a way by management to show him respect by allowing him to choose which team he wants to sign with as a UFA.
With the season he's just had many teams will be knocking on his door and offering Pitlick a contract, and though those contracts won't be too rich by NHL standards he'll be able to pick and choose where he goes and should still make more than league minimum.
Rem Pitlick could very well be this year's Michael Bunting.