What do you guys think?
Stupid. Classless for the habs to continue with this pettiness, but I expect it of this organization.
Until? Whe they relocate to Quebec, they should make it hell for them even moreI think we should strive to make their lives miserable until they relocate to Quebec.
Stupid. Classless for the habs to continue with this pettiness, but I expect it of this organization.
A lot of people speculating on cheapness and whatever. But have no idea for the reason why. If anything it would hurt the bottom line as NHL is gate driven and the more games played the more money owners get. Players don't get paid for preseason.
How could the league not know? Cmon now.....
Canes should be fined. Any other teams play less than 6 games?
This hurts arena staff as well. How many people didn't get a shift at work ( home or away) because the Canes are cheap? Or people didn't get to go to a game (even if an exxy) because of it. Some people that's all they can afford.
Bush league n selfish by Canes
As if the NHL didn't know with or without Habs saying anything (if true) Its BS by the Canes. It's in the agreement. Honor it....simple. They signed up, follow the rules.
But staff at arenas suffer without games financially. Something you omit. And I'm sure much more than an owner does. Ya know the actual working class people.
Bottom line they took money outta common folk workers pockets, denied fans a chance to see a game if they can't afford a reg season game, broke their contractual obligation and saved $ in the process.
Maybe they need the pennies to pay KK?
It looks bad on the nhl if they can't even keep track of whether teams are playing their required number of games.
Mickey mouse stuff.
The worse part is that the league won't do anything to the Canes.
So they played 4 games instead of 6. Big deal.
Reading the article leaves me to believe that Although the CBA states teams have to play 6 pre-season games, I don't think it says or has anything about violating that stipulation.
The only possible advantage the Canes can have in playing less games is less of a chance of early season injury.
Otherwise... big deal!
Actually you missed the point. I didn't omit it, I pointed out that even the owner has a vested interest to hold as many games as possible. He wants his staff there to sell concessions it is in both parties interests. Not like staffers are benefiting from 10 dollar beers. They get paid when the owner makes money, usually by having games that sell gear and grub. They didn't save money by having less games. Where are you guys getting this from. Everyone knows the NHL is gate driven. IE more games= more money. Especially when they DON'T pay the players for exhibition games. So where would they be saving $$$. By not having people buying over priced food and bevs?As if the NHL didn't know with or without Habs saying anything (if true) Its BS by the Canes. It's in the agreement. Honor it....simple. They signed up, follow the rules.
But staff at arenas suffer without games financially. Something you omit. And I'm sure much more than an owner does. Ya know the actual working class people.
Bottom line they took money outta common folk workers pockets, denied fans a chance to see a game if they can't afford a reg season game, broke their contractual obligation and saved $ in the process.
Maybe they need the pennies to pay KK?
NHL senior vp of communications John Dellapina confirmed Friday the Canes had been one in every of a number of groups granted an exemption on the variety of preseason video games from the league.
Actually you missed the point. I didn't omit it, I pointed out that even the owner has a vested interest to hold as many games as possible. He wants his staff there to sell concessions it is in both parties interests. Not like staffers are benefiting from 10 dollar beers. They get paid when the owner makes money, usually by having games that sell gear and grub. They didn't save money by having less games. Where are you guys getting this from. Everyone knows the NHL is gate driven. IE more games= more money. Especially when they DON'T pay the players for exhibition games. So where would they be saving $$$. By not having people buying over priced food and bevs?
If owners had there way there would be more games each season, not less.
So either you just want to disagree with me because I am one of the "haters" or you don't understand the economics of the NHL... you know its OK to agree with someone even if you don't share their POV, esp if they happen to be somewhat correct.