"He's a young player," said Canadiens head coach Michel Therrien of Eller. "I think he'll learn from that. He made inappropriate comments."
Am I the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with this? I don't see why folks are so upset with the coach here. Could've taken a different tact sure but I don't think it's that bad.
MT's got a negative coaching style... I personally am not a fan of it but I've to be honest here he's getting the most out of Eller and Subban. I disagree with it but can't argue with the results.
What I would like to see (and hope happens) is that at some point he 'flips the switch' and starts to praise these guys and gives them more responsibility. If he does that then there's a method to his madness. If not... he runs the risk of losing the room.
As for his comments on Eller here though? I don't have any issue with it and I don't think he's throwing Eller under the bus. Maybe I missed something here but I don't have a problem with anything that MT said.
"He's a young player," said Canadiens head coach Michel Therrien of Eller. "I think he'll learn from that. He made inappropriate comments."
Am I the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with this? I don't see why folks are so upset with the coach here. Could've taken a different tact sure but I don't think it's that bad.
MT's got a negative coaching style... I personally am not a fan of it but I've to be honest here he's getting the most out of Eller and Subban. I disagree with it but can't argue with the results.
What I would like to see (and hope happens) is that at some point he 'flips the switch' and starts to praise these guys and gives them more responsibility. If he does that then there's a method to his madness. If not... he runs the risk of losing the room.
As for his comments on Eller here though? I don't have any issue with it and I don't think he's throwing Eller under the bus. Maybe I missed something here but I don't have a problem with anything that MT said.
Wait a sec, Andy. Weren't you the one in another thread using the absence of Emelin as a major reason for Price's poor finish to last year. Yet you make no mention of him now when we're talking of the Habs' poor play.
This team is missing 6 regulars - I don't give a phoque what the other poster thinks - and very few teams in the league right now can lose six regulars and still win in a consistent fashion. Especially when 3 (Patchs, Prust & Emelin) of those 6 are very important players. You could say 4 if you believed Briere was ready to break out but I'm not one of those so that's why I said only 3.
Habs lost because of bad coaching
Diaz & Gorges on the ice during the 4 on 4
What are the odds we don't have to suffer through Bouillon and Desharnais playing every single game this season? I'm not liking them about as much as I'm not liking having to suffer through them playing every game
On the bright side, any one else think Holland looked way better than expected?
I did not notice him.
"He's a young player," said Canadiens head coach Michel Therrien of Eller. "I think he'll learn from that. He made inappropriate comments."
Am I the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with this? I don't see why folks are so upset with the coach here. Could've taken a different tact sure but I don't think it's that bad.
Yes, that was hilarious and I had no problem with that either...Makes for great 'shopping, though. That's all I care
first off they DIDNT fight
and 2nd if you think thats a reason why we lost well.... wow
I'm not bashing Moen or putting the lose on him. Just saying it was a stupid and useless fight which to me changed the mood of the game.
He probably got his ice time cut later in the game, but in the first period he looked good. Made some nice plays to keep possession of the puck.
Only MaxPac is our only key injury.
Parros, really?
Drewiske, who?
Murray, he's a better version of Parros on defense. In other words, he sucks at defending, but can scrap pretty well.
Briere, we're better without him in the line up. Was an obvious dumb signing, the only persons that defended it were guys that just weren't ready to criticize MB yet.
Emelin, let's stop pretending like Emelin was this amazing shutdown defender. He was a decent guy, top 4 at best, who brings a physical presence but he was not the rock everybody make him out to be. He was still getting confused on what side to play on for crying out loud.
Prust, no doubt, brings good things to our club. But he's a 3rd liner, we should be more than fine without him. I wouldn't classify him as a key injury, otherwise you can pretty much say 80% of the players are key.
MaxPac, our best winger. Definitely a key injury.
So ya, we have injuries, we still have Eller-Gally-Galla-Plek-Gio-DD-Bourque-PK-Markov-Gorges-Diaz-Price. We should be able to at least put out a consistent effort.
Because that was in response to Eakins mocking Eller."He's a young player," said Canadiens head coach Michel Therrien of Eller. "I think he'll learn from that. He made inappropriate comments."
Am I the only one who doesn't see anything wrong with this? I don't see why folks are so upset with the coach here. Could've taken a different tact sure but I don't think it's that bad.
MT's got a negative coaching style... I personally am not a fan of it but I've to be honest here he's getting the most out of Eller and Subban. I disagree with it but can't argue with the results.
What I would like to see (and hope happens) is that at some point he 'flips the switch' and starts to praise these guys and gives them more responsibility. If he does that then there's a method to his madness. If not... he runs the risk of losing the room.
As for his comments on Eller here though? I don't have any issue with it and I don't think he's throwing Eller under the bus. Maybe I missed something here but I don't have a problem with anything that MT said.
Because that was in response to Eakins mocking Eller.
It showed that Therrien agreed with Eakins, and I don't like to see that. He showed have Eller's back.
Furthermore, I'm willing to bet anything that everybody agreed with Eller's comment, so to call him out on it is a tad hypocritical. Also, his comments were taken out of context, i wouldn't be surprised if what he said came out of a coaches mouth, like PK in CGY. I'm convinced of it actually.
I would just like to see Therrien stick up for his guys for a change.
The comments were inappropriate. I think it's important that not only our coach say it - but Eller as well. You have to at least acknowledge that the comments were wrong here otherwise it looks like you agree that the Oilers are a junior team. He HAS to speak out on the comments man. Can you imagine if some other team said that about us? We'd all be waiting for an apology from that team's players and coaches. So he acknowledged that it was wrong. This was the right thing to do.Because that was in response to Eakins mocking Eller.
It showed that Therrien agreed with Eakins, and I don't like to see that. He showed have Eller's back.
Furthermore, I'm willing to bet anything that everybody agreed with Eller's comment, so to call him out on it is a tad hypocritical. Also, his comments were taken out of context, i wouldn't be surprised if what he said came out of a coaches mouth, like PK in CGY. I'm convinced of it actually.
I would just like to see Therrien stick up for his guys for a change.
Jeeze Marc Bergevin must be a real idiot for giving those other players not named Paccioretty contracts. So at the start of the season why didn't he call up Hamilton and ask the Dogs to send 5 other scrubs who would be willing to play for peanuts because Parros, Prust, Emelin, Murray & Briere don't make a difference if they're in or if they're out.
P.S. notice I made no mention of Drewiske.
The parity in this league is a reality and there's very little difference between the teams. You take 6 NHLers off any team you start to fall off the parity totem poll. And don't give me this crap that those players don't make a dif. If They didn't make a difference, they would be playing in the AHL or in KHL or posting on these boards.
The comments were inappropriate. I think it's important that not only our coach say it - but Eller as well. You have to at least acknowledge that the comments were wrong here otherwise it looks like you agree that the Oilers are a junior team. He HAS to speak out on the comments man. Can you imagine if some other team said that about us? We'd all be waiting for an apology from that team's players and coaches. So he acknowledged that it was wrong. This was the right thing to do.
He also said Eller was a young player and that he'll learn from it. I don't see how this is throwing him under the bus. The comments WERE inappropriate and MT acknowledged it... he didn't make fun of Eller or blast him. Just said that it was the wrong thing to say and that his young player would learn from it.
Nothing wrong with that as far as I see anyway.
What should he have said here?
Bouillon > Diaz
IMHO