Your inability to comprehend specific statements and then making silly extrapolations from said misinterpreted statement is quite remarkable. Never mind that one of the fundamental purposes of paragraphs is to separate distinct ideas.
The two general components of measuring offensive aptitude are the number of points scored AND how many games these points are scored in. Malkin's point totals given the number of games played is quite ridiculous. But I never stated Malkin's pace is the boundary between aptitude or ineptitude.
As far as I cann tell be boundary between offensively prolific and not is around 60 points in 82 games. Legwand is quite a bit lower than that and Malkin is quite a bit higher than that.
Whatever man, you're one of those who probably /facepalm when DD scored the game winner, and it's just sad on so many levels.
No one ever said DD is a prolific centerman, but he did have a prolific stretch last year, don't dismiss that, almost a PPG for 58 games. Almost Malkin's pace. But that dosen't make DD an end all be all prolific centerman, that makes him a valuable piece though. And I like where this team is going, although we clearly haven't played that well.
Please comparing DD with Malkin is a straw man argument, if you don't find something else it's just a waste of time. As is comparing Legwand to DD. Actually if you'd know anything about the NHL, Legwand is more comparable to Plekanec, productive 2-way forwards who master the PK. DD's game isn't close to Legwand's. Legwand's a fast skater and hustler and DD is a finesse passer. They do not get the same types of goals and assists. The comparison ends with the stats sheet if you actually watch them play.