Someone needs to explain to me how Subban got 3rd star...
He drew first penalty, then made a great play for Galchenyuk to tie it and won it in OT.
I would have given him first star tonight, if not at least 2nd star. Ridiculous.
I love Subban, myself. My Dad
sounds like a racist whenever Subban is on the ice. That's how much he hates him.
Let,s be honest a second, though. If you actually watched the game, Subban was, indeed, a reason for our win, after looking beyond Price, the obvious reason for our win in the first place!
If Price didn't deserve the first star over Subban, something is seriously wrong. There's no reason ANYONE should be upset Price got a nod before Subban.
That said, it was one of Subban's bigger impact games on an offensive front. However, anyone who can't admit he often played by the seat of his pants, despite being on the receiving end of the offensive merit for the win, is blind, to be polite.
Too many Tipsy Turvies holding the puck on the end of the stick with one arm as he fends off opponents in semi-circles in his own zone or in the O-zone as the last D at the blue line, ripe for a breakaway if the opponent succeeds in stripping the puck.
That Subban didn't commit any costly turnovers and ended up setting up the tying goal and scoring the winning goal does't necessarily erase the bad/risky decisions or choice of plays that occurred more than occasionally throughout the game.
Just saying, to be objective, rather than cheering blindly due to a good box score….