604
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2011
- 7,289
- 1,493
Of course you don’t see Miller as a core. He scored 99pt as a center last year and in the other thread you said he isn’t even a top6 player. Like the hate you have for him has clouded you so much.I dont count Miller and Demko as core players.
I think the players that will be worth their contracts, and still be here as core pieces once the mess this team is in has been cleared is two. Hughes and Pettersson. Unless they demand a trade.
Nothing dishonest about that.
You still dont understand there is so much more to building a team than having those two players.
Please now answer that question.
We are well on our way to you being wrong. What is the goal post you would set that would make you admit that yeah, you got this wrong?
Signing more wingers will fix thisIt’s almost like our goaltending sucks, but our defence is also bottom 5 in the league and leads to even worse goaltending and the two are linked.
Holtby, Halak, Martin, Delia and this seasons Demko.Goaltenders steal games, that’s a thing in hockey with good or bad teams. It’s arguably the most important “make or break” position on the team.
The Flames are supposedly struggling because Markstrom has had a tendency to let in a bad goal in many games. In our games this season, you’d be hard pressed to find a game where we haven’t let in 2-3 bad goals. It’s incredibly demoralizing to go into a game knowing that there’s a good chance that your goalie is going to shot the bed.
Holtby and Halak were essentially damaged goods before they even donned the Canucks jersey,Holtby, Halak, Martin, Delia and this seasons Demko.
Playing in a completely broken environment teaches bad habits to goalies.
That goal at the beginning of the 3rd demoralized the team completely..Been killing the team all year.Goaltenders steal games, that’s a thing in hockey with good or bad teams. It’s arguably the most important “make or break” position on the team.
The Flames are supposedly struggling because Markstrom has had a tendency to let in a bad goal in many games. In our games this season, you’d be hard pressed to find a game where we haven’t let in 2-3 bad goals. It’s incredibly demoralizing to go into a game knowing that there’s a good chance that your goalie is going to shot the bed.
Problem isn't the core. It's the dumpster fire around it. Meat head or not. We had a players coach before and it worked for a bit now we get the hard ass. Who cares. Players atleast the worthwhile ones seemed to buy in more for a bit. It's a flawed roster. What makes you think I care at this point tank away.Guys a meathead. Just listen to him talk. 3 more years, boys!
Problem core has always been ownership. Of course. But this guy ain’t helping.
And became undamaged when they moved on.Holtby and Halak were essentially damaged goods before they even donned the Canucks jersey,
He’s just got here,he’s got nothing to worry about..There’s going to be more games like this,and it will be back to the drawing board the next day ..rinse,repeat..and this will happen until the penny finally dropsHow long until Tocchet wears out his welcome?
I thought they were a bubble playoff team this season..and I think the management did as well..It certainly wasn’t far fetched (or a high bar) when you consider how Boudreau finished the season..You would have expected that they would have picked up where they left off.You know the real scary thing is not that this team sucks......it's the fact that Canuck management had no clue going into this season just how bad a team they were.
I mean teams like Chicago, Arizona, Anaheim and San Jose knew they were bad.....and I'm sure provided an early warning to their fan base for patience.
The Canucks, on the other hand, had their sights set on the playoffs at the start of the season. But right now they're closer to 31st overall than they are to a wildcard spot. And after tonight's game they're just a point up on San Joes and just two up on Arizona.
It's not beyond the realm of possibility that this team could finish 29th ahead of only the Ducks, Hawks and the Blue Jackets.
It takes a special kind of management incompetence to so completely overrate and fail to actually grade your team.
I thought they were a bubble playoff team this season..and I think the management did as well..It certainly wasn’t far fetched (or a high bar) when you consider how Boudreau finished the season..You would have expected that they would have picked up where they left off.
I didn’t foresee the season going absolutely pear shaped pretty much right off the bat.
Isn't that what we did to Tryamkin?
Haven’t even been here 10 years bro..and opinions are like assholes..everybody has got one..even you.You haven't foreseen anything no matter how obvious for the last 10 years you've been posting here
Haven’t even been here 10 years bro..and opinions are like assholes..everybody has got one..even you.
Except its not.I don’t think it’s about controlling peoples opinion, it’s about calling out ridiculous opinions.
You can argue whether this is sucking or tanking or whatever’s. But regardless of how, we are still trending towards a top10 maybe even top 5 finish and we have another 1st rounder from the Bo trade. That’s the result of a tanking team.
Like imagine we are actually purposeful tanking right now, this is the exact same result you would expect if that was the case.
It’s weird to me to see people arguing that we should rebuild looking at this and still not be happy about the results.
Again your reading comprehension leaves alot yo be desired.No coach owns a system, who the f*** ever talks like that?
Coach’s implements a system for the team to follow. There is no such thing as owning. Are you like f***ing drunk or something?
Agree 100 percentHow long until Tocchet wears out his welcome?
Coach never has the hammerHe’s just got here,he’s got nothing to worry about..There’s going to be more games like this,and it will be back to the drawing board the next day ..rinse,repeat..and this will happen until the penny finally drops
Guys that don’t buy In will likely get shipped out.
The coach has the hammer right now..not the players
Holy f*** lmao
It actually also gives them some decent cap room the first couple of years which is where the current crunch lies. The 4.9 MM years will hopefully come right when the cap starts to move significantly. If they can convince ownership to pony up the $20 mil I think they have to do it.I mean with OEL it's next to impossible to avoid having those two years at like 4.9MM in a season or two, but the question is simply this: do you think you can field a better D man in that roster spot for ~2.35MM for two seasons in years where OEL will be 33/34? I'd take that bet all day.