Cursed Lemon
Registered Bruiser
but their paths were also very different
Okay so that's one difference.
but their paths were also very different
LOL, Sakic was the superior player, he was more clutch and clearly a better leader than Yzerman but okay...
LOL, Sakic was the superior player, he was more clutch and clearly a better leader than Yzerman but okay...
Clearly. You dominating that :rollseyes: emoji! Clearly!
Nope, Sakic was CLEARLY better, deal with it.Sorry bud, Yzerman was CLEARLY better
Yzerman was and is better than Sakic, just like Detroit was and will always be better than Colorado.
God, it must suck being an Avs fan.
You make some points but I will say Salic was not ever an excellent/Selke-caliber defensive forward. Sure, maybe he got votes back then when the standard for voting was VERY different (plus/minus was still considered a great indicator of defensive play for example) but he was never better than an average to slightly above average defensive player. There were at least a half dozen guys on his own team head and shoulders above him defensively every season of his career.Their career totals may look similar - but their career paths are actually not that similar at all. Which is what I took the first post to mean.
Yzerman was an offensive guru up to age 27-28 or so. Then he became more of a defense player - still great offense, but significantly less than before. And in his last few seasons his offense dried up even more.
Sakic peaked offensively at age 31. He also had a 100 point season at age 37. He also combined Selke defense and league leading offense (#2) at same time in 2001, whereas with Yzerman in his career it was usually either/or.
In terms of playoffs - Sakic has the best single run between the 2 by far. Yzerman has very strong playoffs overall, but he was never a world beater come playoff-time, Sakic has a bit of an edge there.
Of course there are similarities between the 2 - but their career arcs/path are actually not all that similar. I stand by my initial comment.
He's not their GM but don't forget about how Toronto has Brendan Shanahan as their team President. After all Shanahan and Yzerman were on the same Red Wings teams that went up against Sakic and Colorado when both teams hated each other.For people who watched during the 70s, I'm sure Philadelphia GM Bobby Clarke versus Montreal GM Bob Gainey was pretty interesting.
LA has former captain Rob Blake as GM but they didn't win Cups with him, Boston has Don Sweeney but he was never captain.
Wow... Individual accomplishment vs team accomplishment. One has an Hart and Pearson and the other one doesn't.If you want to really get down to the nitty gritty you can say Sakic had edge in terms of points per/ goals per but Yzerman has that 3rd cup - really close either way you slice it
Wow... Individual accomplishment vs team accomplishment. One has an Hart and Pearson and the other one doesn't.
Keep drafting those 1st overalls..
Nope, Sakic was CLEARLY better, deal with it.
View attachment 218289
LOL Someone is salty here. This is why the Avalanche is in the second round and the Dead Wings are... Dead Wings.
God, it must really suck to be a Dead Wings fan.
Ya and lets not forget how historically bad the Wings were in the 70's and 80's when there was even not a cap lol.Keep drafting those 1st overalls..
Lets not forget how historically bad the Avs were after the cap.
Don't make me break out The Mule to terrorize the Avalanche some more
Please tell me how Yzerman had a better career than Sakic when the latter has more individual awards (and 1st All-Star Team selections) than the former?These are all things I'm stating that are typically used to discredit Yzerman and boost Sakic - it is a classic individual vs team argument and it will be interesting if it is ever definitively answered. I think Sakic has the better peak but Yzerman better career.
Please tell me how Yzerman had a better career than Sakic when the latter has more individual awards (and 1st All-Star Team selections) than the former?
What you basically said in your posts was that the Red Wings was a better team than the Avalanche overall and it was the reason why Yzerman did have more team accomplishments (Stanley Cups) than Sakic, that's it. You also said that Sakic had the better peak but Yzerman the better career when it's not because one has more individual awards than the other one.I just wrote two obnoxiously long posts basically explaining why I thought exactly that - I'm not sure what more you would want me to write?
Please tell me how Yzerman had a better career than Sakic when the latter has more individual awards (and 1st All-Star Team selections) than the former?
LOL Team accomplishment again...1755 is greater than 1641
3 is greater than 2
LOL Team accomplishment again...
One Hart and one Pearson greater than 0. Concerning total points career, one had played in the 80's and the other did not and still scored 100 points at the age of 37.
Yep, the truth indeed but good night with your false belief that Yzerman > Sakic.Whatever you gotta tell yourself to sleep at night
Yzerman was and is better than Sakic.
Detroit was and will always be better than Colorado.
God, it must suck being an Avs fan.
Outside of cgf he has.Maybe this is the year Sakic starts getting some credit as a GM
Won a series, one of the youngest teams in the league, outstanding cap management, #4 pick at the draft etc.
Hahaha, this is so Dead Wings thing.This one I can agree on. As an Avs fan, it does suck. Nothing exciting happening with them at all, no true star players ... stuck on the couch watching the playoff teams