VanCanucks53
Registered User
We're definitely not even close to being better than them.agree hawks is overrated and not better than Vancouver.......Sharp and Hossa health is a question mark
We're definitely not even close to being better than them.agree hawks is overrated and not better than Vancouver.......Sharp and Hossa health is a question mark
We're definitely not even close to being better than them.
This is how I see it:
Van Centre depth > Chicago Centre depth
Van Winger depth < Chicago winger depth
Van Defense depth (as of right now) < Chicago defense depth (fairly equal when healthy IMO)
Van goaltending > Chicago goaltending
Van coaching < Chicago coaching
Yeah on paper the Canucks match up very well with the Blackhawks. The issue is the game has to actually be played on the ice. I think the main problem right now is:
How the canucks are playing<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<How the blackhawks are playing
Chicago is nowhere close to "one of the best teams the NHL has ever seen". No freakin' way.
In terms of lineup, no, but in terms of results they are. They're currently on a 136 point pace which would break the NHL record and they have an .830 points % which would be 2nd highest in NHL history (behind the 1929-1930 Bruins who put up an .875 record in a 44 game season).
Granted their record is inflated by the shootout, so their adjusted pace is more akin to a 122 or so point pace (.744 record) under the old system. Still, that's about as good as it gets in the modern era outside of the late '70s Canadiens and the 95-96 Red Wings.
Chicago is nowhere close to "one of the best teams the NHL has ever seen". No freakin' way.
And their season is done - they're the top seed - they're going to be resting and going through the motions the rest of the way.
In terms of lineup, no, but in terms of results they are. They're currently on a 136 point pace which would break the NHL record and they have an .830 points % which would be 2nd highest in NHL history (behind the 1929-1930 Bruins who put up an .875 record in a 44 game season).
Granted their record is inflated by the shootout, so their adjusted pace is more akin to a 122 or so point pace (.744 record) under the old system. Still, that's about as good as it gets in the modern era outside of the late '70s Canadiens and the 95-96 Red Wings.
Obviously the shortened season makes things a little different (San Jose had an .800+ record after 48 games in 08-09 and ended up losing in the 1st round) but the Blackhawks year so far has been about as impressive as any in recent memory.
Somehow the pre-season hype on Edmonton eroded half way during the season, they peaked at that five game winning streak.
Nucks win 38 to 2.
Kane, toews and bolland out with season ending groin injuries.
LOL delusional people think we're better than the Hawks. We've been ''better'' than the Hawks one year since we first played them in 2009 and even that is debatable because even with their team ripped apart by the cap we still needed 4 games and overtime to put them away after taking a 3 game lead.
Chicago has better top end players at every position except goal. We don't have a Keith or Seabrook who can play 30 minutes in a game, we have a much worse coach and our special teams are a complete laughing stock.
We might be able to squeak out a lame shootout win but in a 7 gam series... yeah right. They can up their game much more than we can.
We might be able to squeak out a lame shootout win but in a 7 gam series... yeah right. They can up their game much more than we can.
Check out the Minny-Canucks playoff series in 2003....Chicago has better top end players at every position except goal.