theguardianII
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2020
- 3,313
- 1,734
Sell low?Buy high sell low.
This is how we do it.
More like donate
Sell low?Buy high sell low.
This is how we do it.
That question was answered the second they announced the pick.Hmmm, Tkachuk or Juloevi?
The shock from the crowd and announcers was clear. The choice was clear but Jim was hellbent on drafting a D-man. He telegraphed it for months. As well, I thought it was Sergachev they were looking at. Sigh.That question was answered the second they announced the pick.
From the London knights the Canucks are proud to select.... *groan*
I'm sure Garland will get traded for a salary dump and some peanuts, and become a 75 point play driver for his new team.
7uongo!Maybe we can give up 7 goals as a tribute to the almighty Lou...
How about when we effectively traded head coaches with the Rags?I couldn’t find the “let loose, but Canucks related” thread so I’ll just post this very ironic comment.
View attachment 615638
Pessimistic Rangers ended up jinxing his team a couple lottery wins, just at the wrong drafts.
Conclusion: not super related to the Canucks or at all you can argue, but I feel it’s a nice little reminder that Canuck luck also has a good side
Listen, I’m just bored again. Either lose a bunch in pathetic fashion and force changes or go on another winning streak and get right into the thick of the playoff picture. No more of this wishy-washy will they-won’t they bullshit. It’s boring and I demand entertainment.
I feel like tonight's game will go in the former category. Hope I'm wrong, but I don't feel especially confident about this one.
The big problem is the entire month is set up to be a .500 accomplish nothing snoozefest. 3 games against teams well clear .500, another 3 against bottom-feeders, and the rest are teams hovering around .500. Just a recipe of mediocrity.