ODAAT
Registered User
Last year's cup run might be giving us a false representation of the effectiveness in the make up of this team. We barely squeezed by the Leafs. The Rangers played some of the worst hockey I've seen in the POs in many years. And the Penguins were their own worst enemy.
Too many pluggers, too many passers, not enough pure goal scorers. Either that or we've got to get pucks to the net and muck out goals. I'd say acquire some more speed and/or pure (irresponsible) talent. But Claude wouldn't have it, and if he did, he'd turn them into hybrid versions of P.J Axelson.
So the Bruins had nothing to do with the way the Rags played or were forced to play??
The Pens missed their chances, any team eliminated from the playoffs do and when they became frustrated, they also became puck hogs who the B`s took care of.
Can`t take anything away from any team who`s made it to the finals, Bruins or otherwise. One could also say, it was a miracle that this team made it that far with Soupy done, Bergy a skating M.A.S.H unit, Seids with a groin issue all playoff etc...
It did show me something, it showed me that this team has crutons and in spite of obstacles, they took, on paper, a much more highly skilled and quick team to 6 games...shoulda been 7 but......
Pure goal scorers have a reputation for doing one thing well, and not having a clue where their own end is, that sound like the kind of player Chia/Cam and Julien like???
Whether we like it or not, chances are a pure sniper isn`t arriving in Boston anytime soon, the organizational approach is to have 4 lines who all play significant minutes who are defensively responsible. For all the warts many here think this team has (and there are a few), I`ll wager the majority of fan bases out there would die to have been able to watch their team play in 2 Cup finals over a 3 year stretch.....not here, entitled/spoiled to a fault IMO