You went on a diatribe when you were here last concerning Provorov's d-zone game and physicality and whatnot, which even people here who criticize him more than most (or
did anyway while paired with Mac and Hagg) wouldn't touch......now you're talking entries and exits. Seems like a totally different topic, but so be it. This is your narrative, and we're just living in it.
Perhaps
@JojoTheWhale or someone else wants to go more in depth about what you said given his access to non-public microstats (I understand why he'd rather do something else). No offense, but I don't trust your numbers either, and you appear to be messily mixing different things together without much context. I know from an article Charlie O'Connor wrote a few months ago using some of that data, he identified Provorov allowing too many passes AFTER controlled entries. But I'm not even sure that's what you meant; you seem to be talking the entry itself. Even so, is 32nd supposed to be bad, if I take your number at face value? You didn't provide actual percentages either, just raw stats/60. If Provorov barely has played in the d-zone the last few months, paired with another exit/entry machine, of course raw numbers/60 go down. Your argument seems messy.
Provorov consistently grades out as an elite entry/exit d-man from every scrap of data I've ever seen, and is right there with Ghost, or even better. He's neck and neck for the best on the team in that facet. Though microstats are but one part of the game, and we see d-men do well/not well regardless of success or lack thereof in that area. Like Provorov excelling in that area last year and coming up shorter in the shot/chance differentials. Ghost followed a similar pattern prior to this pairing. Sanheim didn't do so hot in entries/exits (though he improved before being sent down), but he excelled in shots/chances. But it's irrelevant for Provorov.
By the way, thank you for breaking out the "advanced stats." Were these not your words last time you came 'round ragging on Provorov?