Depends on what you are looking for. All things considered equal, I would take the solid two-way guy in Gardiner. But I'm guessing most teams already have a few of those guys, so I'd take Teubert.
Teubert's nastiness is something that is definitely not a dime a dozen. There are only a handful of guys that are at that level of angry (Petrecki, McIlrath).
Kings fans have been trashing Teubert since his last season in junior and were calling him a bust the next year when he was playing in Ontario of the ECHL when Tyler Myers, who the Kings could've picked instead, was winning the Calder. It's not a new thing.
That said, he's Peckham with some offensive upside. A poor man's Phaneuf, maybe. Anyone expecting Regehr is going to be seriously disappointed. Physically, they're similar, but his defensive awareness and positioning aren't even in the same stratosphere.
I was one of the few Kings fans that liked Teubert. When he was first drafted, I think Regehr was a possible comparison, but since then it's been obvious that he's slow to learn proper reads and positioning, so the Kings have had to re-adjust expectations.
I'd say given enough time, Teubert could be...
- Peckham with some offensive upside, but without the pugilistic skills
- Bryan Marchment-lite
- A meaner Denis Gauthier with slightly better mobility
I don't think a poor-man's Phaneuf is apt: Teubert is a lot more punishing in battles and in the crease, is not even close in offensive ability, and lacks the open-ice hitting ability.
In absolute terms, I think the Kings overpaid with Teubert, but Teubert was probably never going to wear a Kings uniform given the defensive depth the Kings system has, so he was expendable.