ddawg1950
Registered User
Don't think a few months should sway opinion like that. This will be (or should be) a long-term debate. McKeown has a lot of time to develop still... And of course the talk about bargaining position at the time of the trade will remain.
Going to be a long time before this one is resolved, IMO.
You have been consistent with your position on that trade, but with all due respect, this may not ever really get resolved in terms of win/lose the trade.
No one would doubt that McKeown is a good prospect, particularly taken at that position. But...
(A) We needed help in the top nine immediately, particularly when it comes to a playmaking forward who has paid his dues and scored at lower professional and amateur levels. And...
(B) Defensemen often do take longer to develop. McKeown might not make the NHL for another three four years. And not make much of an impact for five or six.
We traded some potential Future for some realistic Now.
Unless Vey totally flames out and McKeown becomes a key D-man, (which could be doubtful) then it will become an ordinary apples and oranges comparison.
If Vey becomes a play making center with some upside, then I am satisfied we got a good deal.