Cheddarcheese
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2023
- 340
- 190
Jarmo is the goat and he has all the right pieces in front of him to be a wagon, its just time and development now
starting a full tear-down rebuild mid-tenure will do that! it's not like rebuilding teams have good records lolLook at his overall record-sub .500. Look at his playoff "success"-one real round of playoff victory.
they had 108 points the year before they traded for panarin lmaoHad Stan Bowman not given Panarin away, then it might be the big goose egg for Jarmo in the playoffs.
every single analysis of draft performance over the last few years has shown that the jackets are one of the best teams at drafting.His drafting record is mediocre.
*sigh* don't make me tap the signHis administrative abilities-remember the Horton insurance fiasco-aren't anything to write home about.
…but he was right, lmaoHis handling of RFAs was pathetic with Johansen and Anderson.
that's not to say he didn't inherit some good pieces – johansen, murray, dubinsky, bobrovsky, foligno – but with the exception of bob the actual core pieces on jarmo's best teams (panarin, jones, werenski, pld) were jarmo guys.
sure, but an incoming GM's job isn't to jettison all of their predecessor's pieces, it's to identify which ones to keep.Jenner, Anderson, Atkinson etc.... etc.... it was mostly a Howson team up front and in net until about 2019.
he inherited a team that:
- was in last place at the time (mid 12-13)
- had finished dead last by a big margin the year prior (11-12)
- had repeatedly whiffed on high draft picks (filatov, brule, picard)
- traded away the only one of those high picks that was a hit (voracek)
- had just gone through the carter & nash trades
that's not to say he didn't inherit some good pieces – johansen, murray, dubinsky, bobrovsky, foligno – but with the exception of bob the actual core pieces on jarmo's best teams (panarin, jones, werenski, pld) were jarmo guys.
And that was what ultimately doomed them to being an also-ran even when they were "competitive:" the team's top talent was pretty middling. You can see the strategy to avoid that with the recent picks since Chinakhov.Jenner, Anderson, Atkinson etc.... etc.... it was mostly a Howson team up front and in net until about 2019.
sure, but an incoming GM's job isn't to jettison all of their predecessor's pieces
And that was what ultimately doomed them to being an also-ran even when they were "competitive:" the team's top talent was pretty middling. You can see the strategy to avoid that with the recent picks since Chinakhov.
How was the Wennberg pick a fail? He's 11th in points from the 2013 draft, bjorkstrand is 12th. He's not first line talent but he would easily still be in our top 9 if not higher if it wasn't for the concussion.I didn't remotely imply that it was.
The correct move was to build off of the foundation Howson laid, and Jarmo tried to do that. I'm not saying he should have done differently. It's just purely descriptive that the team was, more than most clubs, drawn from drafted talent from a previous regime from several years prior.
For sure, the team was loaded with ultra competitive second liners and little to nothing elite. This was known from the beginning in 2013, long before the Chinakhov draft.
Jarmo tried to be aggressive and swing for topline talent. It just mostly failed for a while. The Horton signing, two failed Gaborik trades, the Wennberg and Milano picks.
How was the Wennberg pick a fail? He's 11th in points from the 2013 draft, bjorkstrand is 12th. He's not first line talent but he would easily still be in our top 9 if not higher if it wasn't for the concussion.
But the only players who outperformed him that were taken after him are Burkovsky, Buchnevich, and Guentzel. And who knows if Guentzel produces without that core around him. I get what you're saying but they couldn't have done anything differentlyNot a bad pick but they were trying to get a great player not an okayish one, on a team that wasn't short on okayish players. Most draft picks are failures in that sense, it's not meant to be damming.
But the only players who outperformed him that were taken after him are Burkovsky, Buchnevich, and Guentzel. And who knows if Guentzel produces without that core around him. I get what you're saying but they couldn't have done anything differently
there have been something like 60 players taken 14th overall in the NHL draft. alex wennberg ranks 16th among them in career points and will likely be in the league for another 5-8 years.How was the Wennberg pick a fail? He's 11th in points from the 2013 draft, bjorkstrand is 12th. He's not first line talent but he would easily still be in our top 9 if not higher if it wasn't for the concussion.
One of the greatest in the league? Layoff of the hard stuff. Beer should sufficeLmao he's one of the best GM in the league lets talk about all the good he's done.
Boone at 3.7 lol
provorov at 4.7 easy flip next year
gavrikov for a 1st
savard for 1st and 3rd
PLD for laine
our team has so much talent and the next 7 years are going to be so fkn exciting
actually the big secret that nhl gms don't want you to know is that most of them are pretty badOne of the greatest in the league? Layoff of the hard stuff. Beer should suffice