So at $7.5M, Rask may not even play 50 games because he's too delicate to play 60+. He's a good goalie, but is he worth $7.5M pro-rated over the number of games played?
has nothing to do with him being delicate and everything to do with having a starter caliber backup and wanting to keep an elite goalie fresh so he can do what he did last playoffs
But to answer your dumb question, yes