TheLegend
Hardly Deactivated
Stetcher going for boarding...
Tkachuk should get an instigator.
Tkachuk should get an instigator.
It’s nice listening to a road broadcast that has a clue and aren’t total assholes. Credit to Mike Johnson and Gord Miller.
Tkachuk should get 5 and a game, clear 3rd man in. I'm a bit Stecher fan but that was a dumb penalty.Stetcher going for boarding...
Tkachuk should get an instigator.
Absolutely should've, big ref whiff...Stecher and Stutzle dropped gloves and Tkachuk came in throwing bombs as a 3rd.Stetcher going for boarding...
Tkachuk should get an instigator.
Right? Is that a black and white thing in the rulebook or something they just generally do?Absolutely should've, big ref whiff...Stecher and Stutzle dropped gloves and Tkachuk came in throwing bombs as a 3rd.
Throwing bombs??? He jumped on top.Absolutely should've, big ref whiff...Stecher and Stutzle dropped gloves and Tkachuk came in throwing bombs as a 3rd.
46.16Third Man In - A game misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, shall be imposed on any player who is the first to intervene(third man in) in an altercation already in progress except when a match penalty is being imposed in the original altercation. This penalty is in addition to any other penalties incurred in the same incident. This rule also applies to subsequent players who elect to intervene in the same or other altercations during the same stoppage of play. Generally, this rule is applied when a fight occurs.Right? Is that a black and white thing in the rulebook or something they just generally do?
At their discretion, so if the team is down they don't call it. I love hockey, but man the NHL officiating/rules makes it hard to watch sometimes.46.16Third Man In - A game misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, shall be imposed on any player who is the first to intervene(third man in) in an altercation already in progress except when a match penalty is being imposed in the original altercation. This penalty is in addition to any other penalties incurred in the same incident. This rule also applies to subsequent players who elect to intervene in the same or other altercations during the same stoppage of play. Generally, this rule is applied when a fight occurs.
Stecher and Stutzle have already dropped their mitts. Tkachuk comes in and gets Stecher with a left and two right jabs (maybe throwing bombs was an exaggeration) while jumping on Stecher. It is 2 v 1 fight at that point.Throwing bombs??? He jumped on top.
Yet no one got a fighting penalty?? You might want to rewatch that one.Stecher and Stutzle have already dropped their mitts. Tkachuk comes in and gets Stecher with a left and two right jabs (maybe throwing bombs was an exaggeration) while jumping on Stecher. It is 2 v 1 fight at that point.
It would be extremely rare to see a 3rd man penalty called where no one gets a fighting penalty. The whole thing was a nothingburger except the cross checks.At their discretion, so if the team is down they don't call it. I love hockey, but man the NHL officiating/rules makes it hard to watch sometimes.
I can't even see the post arguing against this lol.Stecher and Stutzle have already dropped their mitts. Tkachuk comes in and gets Stecher with a left and two right jabs (maybe throwing bombs was an exaggeration) while jumping on Stecher. It is 2 v 1 fight at that point.
I did...doesn't matter that no one got a fighting penalty. They dropped their gloves and were in an altercation. If the officials don't want to call it a fight...typically they will throw a roughing or something on the 3rd player to acknowledge...that hey you shouldn't do that.Yet no one got a fighting penalty?? You might want to rewatch that one.