6 games and an OT in and no goals by Toews and one by Kane. Regardless how you slice it, that's not good. Kane gets a pass because his line has performed and
he's collecting assist
Panic the the leading goal scorer in the NHL with 6. Toews, his line mate, only has two assists.
We can talk all day long about possession and history and cold starts.
Ya, it is dumb to talk all day long about something that matters, but runs counter your narrative. Toews' Corsi is a team-leading 57.50. That's with Panik (50.34) and Motte(47.15) on his wings.
The reality is simple. For a guy who had an off year and the fact that he is paid as the highest paid player in the NHL, he is expected to net goals. Period. End of story. The fact that this cold start is following a bad year, that's not good
The reality is only that simple in your mind. Jaeger has said it over and over, Toews is paid for his impact on goal differential. Scoring goals is only a piece of that, preventing goals is a component of his game you seem to keep missing/blatantly ignoring.
Keep in mind, this same player is on the ice for the historically terrible PK. He's also a key part of a PP that has now gone 0-10 in the last two games including 0-4 in regular and 0-2 in OT on Saturday.
Special teams seems to be a systemic issue, or you could just ignore that and blame it all on the player you're railing against.
With the departure of secondary scoring by TT and Shaw and the prevalence of unproven rookies, the highest paid player in the league will need to generate more of that scoring (goals).
I'm not seeing the negative impact on secondary scoring you claim their departures are having. TT has 2 goals, 1 assist- 3 points. Shaw has 1 goal, 0 assists- 1 point. Kruger and Hartman have combined to match that scoring output.
Not too much to ask for the highest paid player in the league, no?
Goals and points can certainly be used to measure Kane's performance, but Toews is a much different player who impacts the game in many other ways.
I run a sales organization for a technology company. I have reps who make more than others. Why? They are better, have a better track record, prepare better, etc. I expect them to perform better. Not an unrealistic expectation.
Your top sales rep is like Kane, he's the one going out there and making all the flashy sales, lighting the sales lamp at a sale per day rate.
You're like Toews, the captain of the sales force. The stabling presence who allows those sales reps to sell with some flash and flair. You're not making as many sales as your Kane sales rep, but I'm sure you'd argue you're just as valuable to your company because you do a lot of other things that take the pressure off Kane rep.