If we were able to win 6 or 7 more games in the first couple of months we'd be thinking playoffs. Winning is fun.
Got the lead early and then played Tippett hockey. Smith was great and the Pearls/Dvo line created chances almost every shift. Other then that line LA controlled the puck all game.
Good point, I'm fine with either. But that theoretical Keller combo makes me salivate.
Yeah that's rough. I'll give it a shot but if I catch a minute of the third I'll be shocked.
Man the more I watch Pearls and Dvo lately the more excited I get. The progression Dvo has made since his first game blows my mind. I really think he has 1st line potential. May never be a ppg player but a 60 point center that is good at everything is a first line center. Like a mix of krejci and Bergeron. Some of you might think I'm crazy but if he wasn't hurt prior to the draft and was a first rounder, he would have always been labeled a #1 center.
I think Doan needs to be paired back up with Martinook. I think there games compliment each other. We love you Doaner but you just can't hang with skilled linemates. I think it would spark Martinook because he seemed far more impressive to me last year. Could be the notorious sophomore slump or could be being forced to adjust to C some games.
What about Perlini-Dvo-Keller? Very good chance Keller ends up a winger. Which is fine with me since he reminds me so much of Kane. If Dvo continues his progression then we let him and Strome battle for #1 and #2. I know people are down on him because WJC or maybe because his brother hasn't quite panned out, but he's still one of the best C prospects in the game today. Remember Perlini had a solid first camp like Strome and then disappointed his 2nd camp like Strome. Let's not write him off like most did with Perlini. With Strome hockey IQ I honestly think we have at minimum a #2C.
And I'm not shocked. Fell sleep during the second intermission, did I miss anything good in the third?
Perlini continues to impress me. He reminds me of Brad Boyes. I could see him having a similar career trajectory. He doesn't always look like the hardest working guy on the ice but just has that finishing ability around the net. He could be one of those guys that quickly but quietly reaches 30-40 goal potential for 2 or 3 years but then evens out to 15-20 goals per year. I'd be A-ok with that.
As someone over the past 2 years who had been hoping, for no reason that I can fathom, that Perlini would turn into a top 6 forward, I am thrilled with his game.
I also think that Dvorak may top out as a 1C. I can imaging a team with Dvorak, Strome, Hanzal and Richardson as centers. Imagine the matchup problems that would create with fast scoring wingers to complement on the top 3 lines and big forwards like Crouse on the 4th!
It would be a meld of Los Angeles and Pittsburgh.
Richardson will be gone after next year, and the way it looks Hanzal this year. We have to make room for Keller and Patrick.
Look at the score.
What about Perlini-Dvo-Keller? Very good chance Keller ends up a winger. Which is fine with me since he reminds me so much of Kane. If Dvo continues his progression then we let him and Strome battle for #1 and #2. I know people are down on him because WJC or maybe because his brother hasn't quite panned out, but he's still one of the best C prospects in the game today. Remember Perlini had a solid first camp like Strome and then disappointed his 2nd camp like Strome. Let's not write him off like most did with Perlini. With Strome hockey IQ I honestly think we have at minimum a #2C.
While the thought of Perlini-Dvo-Keller line in enticing, I think a Perlini-Dvo-Fischer line would be more balanced and effective. Fischer's ability to battle along the boards and make plays in dirty spaces would benefit the other 2.What about Perlini-Dvo-Keller? Very good chance Keller ends up a winger. Which is fine with me since he reminds me so much of Kane. If Dvo continues his progression then we let him and Strome battle for #1 and #2. I know people are down on him because WJC or maybe because his brother hasn't quite panned out, but he's still one of the best C prospects in the game today. Remember Perlini had a solid first camp like Strome and then disappointed his 2nd camp like Strome. Let's not write him off like most did with Perlini. With Strome hockey IQ I honestly think we have at minimum a #2C.
Why would Keller end up a winger? I'm not saying your wrong, but I am curious why you think that.
He's a tiny guy. He's not going to grow much bigger. Might put on weight, but until the other centers around the Pacific retire, he will get owned at center.
Why are people penciling him on the right side for wing? Granted, someone with that skill level should be able to be an asset at any position, but has there been some use of him on the right side in his past?
Why are people penciling him on the right side for wing? Granted, someone with that skill level should be able to be an asset at any position, but has there been some use of him on the right side in his past?
While the thought of Perlini-Dvo-Keller line in enticing, I think a Perlini-Dvo-Fischer line would be more balanced and effective. Fischer's ability to battle along the boards and make plays in dirty spaces would benefit the other 2.
Would be great to have a top 3 lines that were essentially interchangeable.
Perlini-Dvo-Fischer
Reider-Strome-Keller
Domi-Hanzal/OTHER-Duclair/OTHER
Crouse-Richardson/Dauphin-Martinook
Strome and Keller wouldn't work, in my opinion. Both need the puck and even then their play style would constantly clash.
I've said from the moment I was disappointed in his draft selection that he was going to be a LW in the NHL.
Problem is, we have:
Domi
Rieder
Martinook
Crouse
McGinn
Perlini
Duclair
All as LHS wings. Keller won't play center at this level. He just doesn't have the build for it. He can probably put on some serious weight, but that won't happen come October.
Problem is, we have way too many LHS wingers right now, specifically on the left hand wing. This is why I wouldn't even think about penciling him in the line up next season. He isn't built to play center, especially in our division, and there isn't a spot for him on the left wing.
I still think Keller is a center long term. He's not a prototypical "big" center, but if Dvorak and Strome are both lining up down the middle at even strength, he won't have to be. His vision, creativity and puck skills are wasted on the wing, and among his peers, he's been a terrific defensive player and great at faceoffs. He's killing penalties as a freshman at BU, for whatever that's worth.
Think Claude Giroux or Pavel Datsyuk. If anything, I'd move Strome to wing before Keller. Speed is more important than size down the middle.