The Sundqvist hit did get two
Weird feeling after this one tbh.
After game 4 I was incredibly angry because it felt like the Bruins didn't show up. But this game they showed up and got screwed. I know theres countless "okay the call was bad but the bruins didnt deserve this one anyway" posts but it didn't feel like the Blues did anything to earn this win either. I thought they got outplayed a majority of the game and yet they still win.
Yet i'm not as angry, i just want it pushed out of my brain. just pure apathy.
Why do Blues fans feel the need to come here and pretend to be friendly?
Blues have been the better team past 2 games. Their best players have shown up. Bruins just aren’t getting the level of play they need from Bergeron Marchand Krejci Pastrnak. At this stage, your best players have to make their presence known. O’Reilly is owning the Bergeron line. And he’s finding ways to produce offense, ugly offense but offense nonetheless.
I don’t feel good about game 6. Going into their building for a Cup clinching game makes this fan nervous. Potential to get rolled. The Blues are playing some solid hockey.
I don’t want to hear about the refs. We aren’t the Canucks or the Canadiens, we are Bruins fans.
the missed hits to the head on Krug and Mojo were brutal, and clearly the Acciari play but this team played a good first period and did nothing with their chances other than give the Blues hope. Far too many not doing what they are capable of doing or are being outplayed or simply both.I feel similar. We played a good hockey game. Just didn't bury the chances at all. Lacked finish.
We didn't deserve to win per say but we certainly got screwed multiple times in this game.
oh man you're right. Egg on my face. Got it mixed up with a different penalty.
Well now I look dumb. *slowly leaves room*
That's lots of crap, we had plenty of PP before Berube complained about refs without a fine.Mojo hit - clear penalty. Clear
Krug getting stick held leading to clear scoring chance. Clear penalty.
Acciari - OMG.
The goal review on DK play. Striking how few angles NBC gave us. And, every announcer just stopped talking. clear silence. Watch again. eerie silence.
But for me, Rupp on NHL Network saying if you have Marchand on your team, the officials are going to ignore penalties . . .on purpose. So not incompetence, but a purposeful ignoring of the rules, not just for minor offences, but in a game where players can be seriously injured, officials are choosing not to police the game and Rupp is ok with that?
Your fan base is full of hypocrites that are telling us to stop whining about the non-call, after y’all put up a huge stink in the San Jose series.Just wanted to jump in here and say I hate to see a good game tainted by a non call like that. We feel your pain since we went through it with the "hand pass" fiasco but that doesn't make it better.
Everyone in the stands, watching TV, the broadcast booth, and even Bozak knew that was going to get called. Only the four eyes wearing the armbands didn't see it.
I will say though, those that are pointing out earlier Blues penalties not called are looking through Black and Gold glasses. I sat with 12 people screaming at the non calls on Bruins players too. I had no problem with the way the game was called until the Bozak trip. That was inexcusable.
Brad got 2 and 10 for it speedbagging SedinI have been seeing this a lot (about the Canucks), and I don’t get the comparison. It’s been awhile, but I don’t recall plays that Cup Finals where non calls led directly to impact goals. I also don’t recall plays where the Bruins were intentionally trying to hurt their guys with shots to the head.
It was almost all after the whistle, scrum stuff like Marchand speed-bagging Sedin, which should have been called for sure. Or Burrows with the bite on Bergeron.
I get a much different vibe from this series.
I really wish all the posters who root for other teams would just stay out of here. If any Bruins posters are on other team threads or (I'm sorry guys) stupid enough to go on the main boards, then that's not smart and you're looking for trouble quite frankly.
But for all the others who aren't Bruins fans coming here to post your "thoughts" : We don't give two ****ing ****s what you think
I feel similar. We played a good hockey game. Just didn't bury the chances at all. Lacked finish.
We didn't deserve to win per say but we certainly got screwed multiple times in this game.
The story of the game to me was this;
Guys wanted it. They competed. Mix up of lines and 7 guys on d helped, but also hurt. Not enough chemistry so a lot of out of sync play. They started to click at the end, and due to this, they scored a goal and controlled the play the final 8 or so minutes - minus the missed call and goal there.
Bruins can get Gryzz back next game and either go again with 7 d and hope the chemistry continues or go back to basics and put Backes back in. Either way I personally feel they have some things to be very happy about with their play and need to just keep it going. They also ought to be extra pissed with how the game ended and knowing this is their last chance to extend the season.
If they laid an egg like in game 4, I would predict the series being over Sunday. But they showed a lot of compete, just mentally weren’t there yet.
The bruins need to have their best game of the year Sunday night and I believe they will
right. it's like saying you got away with jaywalking so its fine if i get away with armed robberyThe missed calls on both sides thing is funny to me in this series.
"Barbashev delivered a hit to the head which we have seen get called a major and wasn't called"
"Yea well Nordstrom hooked Dunn as they were both going up the ice away from the play and didn't get called so they missed them on both sides!!!"