I still think they're nearly meaningless stats. I'll give that he's a good shot blocker and that has its value.
Oh no, don't tell me you want to use Corsi ratings...
But hits, it depends who's recording, it's subjective, and it's not necessarily a good thing. Lidstrom had no hits but nobody cared. If you're running around like Helm on a good day knocking down everything that moves, maybe your hits are a valuable stat. If you hit a guy as he's making a pass that leads to a goal, rather than poke check it or block the lane, did you do a good thing? If you bump somebody but not hard enough to bother them, did you accomplish anything?
Lashoff, for the most part, physically punishes guys he's up against. He definitely still needs work on his passing lane coverage, positioning without the puck, and anticipating the play, but that should come with time at this level.
Not saying this is you, but why do people seem to disregard the fact that he's a rookie with 34 games played? Is it because he's not Erik Karlsson or Justin Schultz? Or, hell, even Danny DeKeyser?
And giveaways? I think that just means that he rarely touches the puck. And when he does, he chips it out of the zone or makes an easy pass to the guy next to him. Which isn't a horrible thing, but it's nothing praiseworthy in my opinion.
He actually is a pretty good passer (last night's 2 bad giveaways notwithstanding), and usually tries to make the easy pass to whomever is the puck-mover, but he can rifle some outlet passes.
But you know, this discussion is relatively pointless. Attackers will attack, defenders will defend, and the Cycle of Anonymous Message Boards will go on; rarely does anyone sway another's opinion without that person seeing the point(s) themselves.