JohnnyOnTheSpot
I Believe in G-Sus
What a game. Could not be happier with L. Schenn and Bryz. Usually when you notice a defenseman it's not a good thing...not here.
Agreed. I was never a JVR fan so I'm liking this trade so far. Probably liking it more than those who liked JVR though.
As per the Bernie Buzzkill clause of my contract: Kurtis Foster looked awful at times tonight, that pairing of Foster/Grossman will get ripped apart by any team with a half decent cycle.
Nice to say "Knubled" again
Surprising. Mine would have been Read-L. Schenn-Bryz.
To me JVR was frustrating as hell. The guy would have a monster game then disappear for the next couple of games. IMO he was all potential here.The problem with JVR was we could never count on him. He was always injured with this or that and missing games because of it.
I loved that kid's potential but the fact is he just never lived up to it here.
To me, it was no big deal giving him up for Luke because it wasn't like he was always counted on to be one of the guys that you could count on to carry the team in crunch time.
Instead, if you got a big contribution from him it was looked at as a bonus instead of what was actually expected.
I'll take Luke any day over him simply for the fact that we can count on Luke from what we've seen so far.
Foster is definitely soft, but it all depends on how much the forwards help them. Grossmann can definitely battle on the boards.
To me JVR was frustrating as hell. The guy would have a monster game then disappear for the next couple of games. IMO he was all potential here.
JVR may go on to be a good player for the leafs but I was getting sick and tired of waiting for him to put it all together. I feel JVR was every thing flyers fans complained about Jeff carter for.
But whatever we needed defense and JVR was expendable with on forward depth. I'm glad we made that trade even if JVR turns into a 25 goal scorer as long as schenn provides a good physical presence on the back end.
Mine would be
1. Read
2. Simmonds
3. L. Schenn
Bryz was dam good when he had to be.
No denying that on Grossman but the cycle is about wearing down the "D" physically and through skating. There was a good 60 second span (in the 2nd me thinks) where the 2 of them were completely lost, had no clue who to pick up or where to be. Foster's stamina is especially piss poor regardless if he's "just the 6th D-Man" as others will defend him with. It was a horrendous shift and definitely an eye opener moving forward.
I actually saw a post yesterday from a Rangers fan calling Bryz "one of the worst goalies in the league".
What are they watching?
a lot of the beat writers think Laughton will be sent to juniors
Bill Meltzer @billmeltzer
If Flyers didn't intend to keep Laughton, I think he'd have been scratch on wknd road trip, played Tue then been returned to OHL. We'll see
I value his opinion more than the other writers. But like he said we'll see.
The problem with JVR was we could never count on him. He was always injured with this or that and missing games because of it.
I loved that kid's potential but the fact is he just never lived up to it here.
To me, it was no big deal giving him up for Luke because it wasn't like he was always counted on to be one of the guys that you could count on to carry the team in crunch time.
Instead, if you got a big contribution from him it was looked at as a bonus instead of what was actually expected.
I'll take Luke any day over him simply for the fact that we can count on Luke from what we've seen so far.
What's his thinking behind the weekend scratc, playing Tuesday then being sent back?
You forgot the flamingo shot blocking.
Too funny..I see no detail escapes you.
I recall that statement in the offseason from a Toronto fan and I thought it was kind of funny imagining him doing it and I have mentioned it in other threads but I have yet to see it so I guess it was some contrived knock. Let's hope we don't see it though..or maybe just once to see what it looks like if even true...