Thought this was a pretty strong statement to the HF posters who always say OEL is over rated.
Well, those 16 Gamewinners are quite an achievement, but to even draw a comparison between the two is crazy. I like OEL, but Doughty is the best defenseman league and worldwide. The kings won two cups because of their defensive play... despite their crap D. I get that they have excellent two way forwards but Doughty is their most important player.
OEL is one of the best defenders with the puck but even though he isn't quite a liability like Karlsson, he's still far far away from Doughty in terms of defense...
I love when Smitty attacks a forward that runs him. The league doesn't punish that harshly enough, sometimes a goalie has to take matters into his own hands.
Not a single shot on a ****ing 4 on 1!!
This is why we're in ****ing last place. Fire the entire coaching staff for that one play, alone.
Fischer probably is the better all round player than Perlini but he wasn't good enough with the puck. Skating could also be better. He played well but he seemed to have quite some issues with the speed of the game. Was good to have him around. Now he knows what to work on. He'll be back. Was the right call to send him down. Perlini is much more confident with the puck and the better skater. Fischer easily could have stayed with the team in a bottom six role and on the PK but I'd rather have him play top minutes with Tucson to round out his offensive game and gain confidence. Also read that he was able to go to the AHL allstar game. Good for him.
I thought it was a very good game. Chick and Perlini were outstanding, using their speed every shift and creating chances. Dvo, while not good in the dot last night played well and with Perlini on that line it seems Doan is playing much better. Burmi did not stand out but was good with puck and Martinook played a very solid game, as usual. I almost forgot about Crouse. That fourth line was outstanding. Kids are progressing very nicely, and when you add in Domi, Duclair with their speed, Fischer, DeAngelo and Strome next year, it will be fun.
I thought it was a very good game. Chick and Perlini were outstanding, using their speed every shift and creating chances. Dvo, while not good in the dot last night played well and with Perlini on that line it seems Doan is playing much better. Burmi did not stand out but was good with puck and Martinook played a very solid game, as usual. I almost forgot about Crouse. That fourth line was outstanding. Kids are progressing very nicely, and when you add in Domi, Duclair with their speed, Fischer, DeAngelo and Strome next year, it will be fun.
Well, those 16 Gamewinners are quite an achievement, but to even draw a comparison between the two is crazy. I like OEL, but Doughty is the best defenseman league and worldwide. The kings won two cups because of their defensive play... despite their crap D. I get that they have excellent two way forwards but Doughty is their most important player.
OEL is one of the best defenders with the puck but even though he isn't quite a liability like Karlsson, he's still far far away from Doughty in terms of defense...
OEL would be a superstar on virtually any other team in the league.
He's in Arizona, so he's not.
The arena was freezing cold again last night
OEL/Doughty is a flip of the coin. Although OEL has not played well this year. Give Doughty Z as his partner or Schenn this year and have him swap teams with OEL, it would be a different story as to who is (slightly) better.
OEL rank in Norris Trophy voting:
2016...9th
2015...17th
2014...14th
2013...7th
2012...zero votes, even though his 13 goals were more than 18 of the 20 players that did receive votes.
Not saying he should have won the Norris for any of those years, but clearly he gets no respect, and playing in the desert probably is a big reason why.
A problematic stat, but his +/- doesn't help make the case for defensive prowess.
It isn't. A lot of people tend to forget how good our defense is. Our forwards make them look bad at times because:
a.) Some of them just aren't good enough and nothing but turnovermachines
b.) Some of them don't get how to play against the puck...especially in terms of positioning
c.) The forward system doesn't work. It's been the same for years and even though it never worked the Coaches obviously never noticed...
If it wasn't for Smith and the excellent defense we have, I can assure you that our losing streaks would have been a lot more ugly...even though that's hard to believe knowing how ridiculously bad the team was.
You guys can complain about Goligoski, Murphy or Stone as long as you want but they actually do a very good job. Yes, Goligoski was really bad at first, but he really turned it around. Stone wasn't even half as bad as some here wanted him to be. Knowing what he got through, I think he showed really well. Murphy's level may have dropped a bit for a few games, but lately and overall he's done a good job. Same can be said about Chychrun. Schenn has been stellar, just as expected. Not gonna contribute offensively but he's a huge upgrade for our blueline. So smart but at the same time also pretty tough.
Doughty had Voynov but the Kings never replaced him. Martinez is really good but plays the same side as Doughty. Now, is playing with Muzzin or Forbort more fun than playing with Schenn, Stone or Murphy? I doubt that...
Excellent defense? My god man are you blind. OEL is having a tough year, because the other teams focus on him only when he is on the ice. They care less about Murphy or Schenn as they are no threat and both are third pairing Dmen. Stone is playing better of late but is no better than a second pairing, and that is stretching it, and you have Chick who is learning on the job, Gogo who I think has been a big disappointment and you have a mediocre D. I agree that the forwards have to do more, and that will come as the kids progress, but the D has to be much better. But to say our D is excellent is wrong.
I'm with this guy. Glad someone else is saying it too. Measuring the greatness of defensemen with offensive - not defensive - stats is, well... offensive.Part of the reason. But I don't like the idea of giving the award to the defender who scores the most points. Erik Karlsson always was a blatantly bad defender but won how many? Two norris trophies?
OEL is just Karlsson 2.0. Same player, just a bit better defensively. Looking at it like that OEL should have won a trophy...but like I said. The most valuable defender should be the one that does the best job defensively...not offensively. In my view, Keith, Karlsson or Subban should have never won one. Suter, Weber or Doughty were always much better.
I'm with this guy. Glad someone else is saying it too. Measuring the greatness of defensemen with offensive - not defensive - stats is, well... offensive.