dortt
Registered User
if Risto didn't have his head up his rear end, he receives the pass from Pilut and there is no turnover to begin with. What was Risto doing just standing there not moving his feet at all?
Our PP is really good
Thats the same Rob Ray said its a bit a gaffe of both players but certainly not Pilut aloneif Risto didn't have his head up his rear end, he receives the pass from Pilut and there is no turnover to begin with. What was Risto doing just standing there not moving his feet at all?
It is irrelevant what Risto is doing there, (which by the way is covering the lane to the net from the half wall where a Canucks player was), he DID NOT have puck possession, Pilut did and Pilut HAD TIME, he WAS NOT under any serious pressure.if Risto didn't have his head up his rear end, he receives the pass from Pilut and there is no turnover to begin with. What was Risto doing just standing there not moving his feet at all?
It is irrelevant what Risto is doing there, (which by the way is covering the lane to the net from the half wall where a Canucks player was), he DID NOT have puck possession, Pilut did and Pilut HAD TIME, he WAS NOT under any serious pressure.
The kid made a poor decision and an even poorer pass which cost the team a goal, don't try and blame another player for the actions of Pilut, he and he alone is directly responsible for his own actions. Seems to be a problem in today's society, blaming the other guy for something someone else did. smh.
Incorrect.You would be dead wrong in this instance. Yes, Pilut shouldn't have made the pass. But Risto CANNOT be a pylon. Any foot movement, that is a harmless breakout
Sounds like a gross overreaction to having 1 bad game.
What you do with Scandella's retirment pain.
Its certainly hurting the team like on GA 2 and the game before that.
I rather have someone play who is gonna be here longer than this season.
No, we did not have this many wins by the trade deadline last year. nor did we have any excitement like a 10 game win strak.Half of the season now has been at the same point pace as last season
I seem to remember Colorado going on a 10 game win streak and missing the playoffs the year beforeonly one team has ever missed with a 10 game win streak, a columbus team who was bottom 5 all year and then ripped one off in March
Housley is a big proponent of where we are, he placed with 62 points last season and now this season is riding the wave of Eichel, Skinner and Reinhart yet nothing changed with how bad of a coach he is.It's coming with the worst behind-the-1-C center depth in team history and in the league this year. It's coming with not taking advantage of a breakout scoring year for Jack and a career year for Jeff.
Because this team has been exciting this season, every game we play I feel we have a chance to win. I have not felt that in over 8 years. I can tell you what the problem is, YOUR EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT REALISTIC AND WAY TOO HIGH. How often do teams jump from a 62 point season to a 100 point season? Going into this season if anyone expected playoffs they had unrealistic expectations and just because of a win streak you developed completely unrealistic expectations of a team who not more than 2 years ago was playing with a large majority of AHL talent and we still have some on the roster but we have young talent coming up to replace them and developing that talent properly takes time.Why should we feel good about that? Why should we feel good about missing the playoffs but hoping for the future for the eighth year in a row after the previous franchise record was three? For punting Jack's 4th season and just HOPING that we can maybe make it in next season with a similar team to the one that let it fall out of their hands in a way that only they have done in history?
Just last season a team went from 48 points (!) to 95 and made the playoffs.No, we did not have this many wins by the trade deadline last year. nor did we have any excitement like a 10 game win strak.
I seem to remember Colorado going on a 10 game win streak and missing the playoffs the year beforeHousley is a big proponent of where we are, he placed with 62 points last season and now this season is riding the wave of Eichel, Skinner and Reinhart yet nothing changed with how bad of a coach he is.
Because this team has been exciting this season, every game we play I feel we have a chance to win. I have not felt that in over 8 years. I can tell you what the problem is, YOUR EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT REALISTIC AND WAY TOO HIGH. How often do teams jump from a 62 point season to a 100 point season? Going into this season if anyone expected playoffs they had unrealistic expectations and just because of a win streak you developed completely unrealistic expectations of a team who not more than 2 years ago was playing with a large majority of AHL talent and we still have some on the roster but we have young talent coming up to replace them and developing that talent properly takes time.
an outlierJust last season a team went from 48 points (!) to 95 and made the playoffs.
It’s frustrating that we’re close to wasting Jacks 4th season in the league. This team has stretches of good play, you can see the young guns flash ability more often than not lately but we just aren’t picking up points. I’m hovering around stay the course or make a move or two. C.J. should be up full time no doubt. We have far too many corpses on this roster to have a sustainable win streak.
Tavares has made it once in ten years,
Of all teams to finish bottom of their conference since 2013-14, the non-Sabres teams are 5/8 in terms of making it the next season, and the Sabres will be 0/3 in thatt stretch if they miss this year.an outlier
Those teams weren't dismantled down to the foundation, the Leafs had a strong farm team and only removed Kessel and the Pylon, the Edmonton Oilers got McDavid after they were rebuilding for 10 years and had multiple 1sts to bolster their run. The New Jersey Devils already had a foundation and added Taylor Hall while lucking into Hischier and then made the playoffs. The Colorado Avalanche are the complete outliers in this situation.Of all teams to finish bottom of their conference since 2013-14, the non-Sabres teams are 5/8 in terms of making it the next season, and the Sabres will be 0/3 in thatt stretch if they miss this year.
Where is this 60% playoff product supposed to come from?Those teams weren't dismantled down to the foundation, the Leafs had a strong farm team and only removed Kessel and the Pylon, the Edmonton Oilers got McDavid after they were rebuilding for 10 years and had multiple 1sts to bolster their run. The New Jersey Devils already had a foundation and added Taylor Hall while lucking into Hischier and then made the playoffs. The Colorado Avalanche are the complete outliers in this situation.
Also of note, most of those teams had more points then us when hitting rock bottom and the following year made it in with 90 to 95 points which this year in our conference, 95 seems like the minimum teams will be sneaking in. We would have a better chance this year to repeat what those other teams did if we were playing in the Western Conference.
Its possible but missing the playoffs isn't end all be all when we don't even have 60% of the our playoff product on the roster.
Youth in our system, Nylander, CJ Smith, Asplund (Guhle if he can find his game) to name a few and we have some good potential a year or two out and 3 first round picks to bolster our ranks either thru the draft or a young quality NHLer.Where is this 60% playoff product supposed to come from?
Outside of Hall and Nico that Devils team/roster was complete toilet water.Those teams weren't dismantled down to the foundation, the Leafs had a strong farm team and only removed Kessel and the Pylon, the Edmonton Oilers got McDavid after they were rebuilding for 10 years and had multiple 1sts to bolster their run. The New Jersey Devils already had a foundation and added Taylor Hall while lucking into Hischier and then made the playoffs. The Colorado Avalanche are the complete outliers in this situation.
Also of note, most of those teams had more points then us when hitting rock bottom and the following year made it in with 90 to 95 points which this year in our conference, 95 seems like the minimum teams will be sneaking in. We would have a better chance this year to repeat what those other teams did if we were playing in the Western Conference.
Its possible but missing the playoffs isn't end all be all when we don't even have 60% of the our playoff product on the roster.
Those 1sts, if all are selected, won't be ready for another 3 yrs or so most likely. That's over half of Jack's current contract time, and that's if they pan out, which I wouldn't count on 1 or 2 of the 4. Even then, what if they're just secondary or complimentary pieces?Youth in our system, Nylander, CJ Smith, Asplund (Guhle if he can find his game) to name a few and we have some good potential a year or two out and 3 first round picks to bolster our ranks either thru the draft or a young quality NHLer.
Thing is Jack boy, if we're in the playoffs race come march and we're 1-2 points out, I'm going to be thinking, "God dammit we should have beaten Vancouver (Without pettersson) and Edmonton. how did we lose to themFine, I’ll let everyone be depressed then, I’m pointing out something they can build off after the break. The effort tonight and a big win over Calgary, or maybe we should just say oh we lost so obviously we’re awful and there’s nothing to build off. It doesent matter that in the first period we held a territorial advantage for 15 of the 20 minutes, and outchanced and shot them two to one overall then lost by a goal ..if they play like this, they have a chance.
People are acting like we were playing two weeks ago with some of the comments. I hear this team needs to figure it out? What? So they are supposed to play better then dominating the other team? Effort is everything. We didn’t get the bounces, I wouldn’t be saying this if we didn’t play like we did tonight. I’m not some rob ray needing to say something positive. I understand the frustration
Vancouver is the team I hate the most so the fact I’m positive right now shocks even me, but like I said i dig efforts like that.
Yes, we have seen a fairly large sample size of Pilut playing great hockey.We've seen a fairly large sample size. In my opinion, he'd benefit from more time in the AHL. It's not the garbage heap, it's for his development.
Those 1sts, if all are selected, won't be ready for another 3 yrs or so most likely. That's over half of Jack's current contract time, and that's if they pan out, which I wouldn't count on 1 or 2 of the 4. Even then, what if they're just secondary or complimentary pieces?
Same with the current prospects in the system.