I think the biggest difference is the difference in style with the East vs the West. It took him ten or so games to really figure out that he needs to jump in on the forecheck and doggedly hound the puck carrier. He relied more on positioning in the East and this is how his coaches wanted him to play.
Once he started to have success with being more aggressive it opened the food gates and he's incorporated that jump into his overall game, turning him into a great player for the Avs. He's been pretty close to ROR's best games recently with his two way game.
I'm a big soda fan, but no. He's not been at the level ROR was during that magical year next to duchene or the second half of last season.
If Soderberg is ever going to be better than ROR, he certainly hasn't shown it yet. I love how well he's playing too, but let's not get too excited over this.
I see Soderberg much more like Stastny than O'Reilly.
O'Reilly's style was smart, but he chased down pucks a lot, and could retrieve extremely well. Hence the absurd amount of take-aways.
Stastny & Soderberg are much more cerebral and preemptive in the way they read the play and try to get in front of it IMO. But neither were as good about straight up going and getting the puck back as O'Reilly.
I think this is why it took people a little longer to warm up on Soderberg, while others liked him right away and could appreciate his quiet production and contribution away from the play.
Now that hes even more involved (just generally a little more aggressive) and people are watching him specifically more, more people are appreciating his game.
I do think Soderberg might get some Casper treatment over his years here though. Who knows maybe not as much though, because we are not wishing and hoping he returns to putting up 70 points.
Offensive hockey IQ is where I am surprised, the fact that he can do it so well in all three zones. I do wonder to myself what kind of point totals he'll have regularly once him and Landeskog really get used to each other.