Post-Game Talk: GAME #36 - Sharks def. Canucks - 3-2

shortshorts

Registered User
Oct 29, 2008
12,637
99
This has been my point the entire time.

However, it has not been the topic of discussion which what I believe was did we run two or three scoring lines before it grossly deviated for some reason.

We only had 2 scoring lines in 2011.

My argument is that this current team is better suited to 3 offensive lines

edit: I'm also extremely tired, so if I'm not reading clearly ignore me :laugh:
 

Co Ho*

Guest
1) Best line in hockey
2) Extremely hot scoring centre
3) High scoring defensive core
4) Great Goaltending

That build would have won the cup if we weren't injured.

However, currently, we don't have the best line in hockey, a sniping version of Kesler, nor a high scoring defensive core.

We need offense, and health. Our defensive core is still very good (despite looking like crap), our offense has not been.

Don't forget a fresh PP, with Newell Brown's first year here, but now teams have figured us out.
And the roles that Ehrhoff and Torres played really helped our scoring and toughness.
 

theripper

Registered User
Jan 22, 2010
1,168
37
Vancouver
The sharks are lucky we haven't had a PP this game.

We're lucky we haven't had a PP this game.

ColbertStewartBravo.gif
 

John Bender*

Guest
Is Ray Sheppherd still around? This team needs scoring BAAAAAAAD.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad