GDT: Game #31 of the season Ducks visit Wild 8:00 PM ET on 12 - 10 - 19

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheGoodShepard1

Dongle Digits. Fire Newell Brown
Nov 26, 2017
10,152
14,673
The NHL is being sued for “not protecting their players”...so this is how it goes

Sure, and I agree with your initial point, but if you’ve already called the penalty and he’s elected to stay out there. You shouldn’t openly be demanding he abandon his defensive responsibility when you’re already a man down
 

ADHB

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 9, 2012
3,929
4,617
Sure, and I agree with your initial point, but if you’ve already called the penalty and he’s elected to stay out there. You shouldn’t openly be demanding he abandon his defensive responsibility when you’re already a man down
It’s a hilarious rule because they’re trying to protect the players, but will simply call a penalty if a player chooses to play without the helmet. Shouldn’t they blow the play dead and then call the penalty? They had no issue letting Lindholm stay out there with no bucket for 20 seconds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Getz2noone

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,291
Rakell is a dumbass in overtime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad