GraveyTrain9
Registered User
My vote is to swap Fast for Carcillo.
I'd rather not feed into the Flyers' goonery. In the end, they benefit from going down that road and not us.
My vote is to swap Fast for Carcillo.
i agree completely with this post... plus, lets flip this around.
Flyers get all confident and think they are GOAT because they finally won a game at MSG... you think they are going to come out flying game 3? Maybe for half of the first period, but it will be an even period, they'll calm down, and that's when we take over.
I would not worry. Chances are philly is so high on this win that they aren't in reality. Reality is the Rangers are the better team.
I have a feeling when all is said and done we're going to find out McDonagh is playing hurt.
He looks much slower than normal, and much less engaged than normal.
Hard to believe it is just rust.
Are we really the better team by a large enough margin that it matters? 2 points is what separated us in the standings, right?
The Flyers made the adjustment taking away the pass in the slot. Emery can stop the puck when he is square to the shooter. Four of the Rangers six goals have come from having Emery go post to post. The Rangers need net presence. Not many players can do that. Kreider has a broken hand. Callahan is in Tampa. Pouliot. AV said Kreider has improved but he wouldn't elaborate. Kreider has been skating by himself but he is not expected to play in this series. The hand needs to heal. Kreider hasn't played since March 24. The Rangers are the better team but not by much. Its a toss up series. The better team doesn't always win. Teams aren't awarded an extra goal because they are the "better" team. Its 1-1. Game 3 is tonight. Game 4 is not until Friday. The Rangers are coming home tonight. After game 3,the games come fast. Friday. Sunday. Tuesday. Wednesday. The Flyers are a good team. There is another team playing in the series besides the Rangers. Giroux hasn't done anything yet and the series is 1-1. Nash will be "active" tonight and he will shoot the puck into Emery's stomach 3 or 4 times.
Yes the Rangers are and where you sit in the standings is not fully indicative of the kind of team you are. If standings were everything they would just skip the playoffs and hand out the Stanley Cup along with the President's trophy.
Outside of the MSL goal and that one play when Nash bulled his way to the net and almost scored, I thought the Stepan line was trash. Really disappointed with the 4th line as well. Normally they come with way more energy regardless of what the other lines are doing.
I thought the 4th line was the best even strength line in game 1, very quiet in game 2 besides Dorsett being an idiot again.
I think MSL - Stepan - Nash are getting a bit better at ES, although Nash's straight up unwillingness to engage in contact is one of the most infuriating things I've seen as a Ranger fan.
The Hagelin - Richards - Fast line is largely a black hole.
Are we allowed to take Philly's horrid start off the ledger like we do with the Rangers when doing this analysis?
Thanks in advance.
I thought the 4th line was the best even strength line in game 1, very quiet in game 2 besides Dorsett being an idiot again.
I think MSL - Stepan - Nash are getting a bit better at ES, although Nash's straight up unwillingness to engage in contact is one of the most infuriating things I've seen as a Ranger fan.
The Hagelin - Richards - Fast line is largely a black hole.
I still don't understand why MSL and Nash need to be on the same line.
Hagelin-Stepan-Nash
Fast-Richards-MSL
Pouliot-Brassard-MZA
The major issue, as you and I have both pointed out, is the lack of anyone willing to go the dirty areas to retrieve pucks and fight the tough battles. This team is all skill at this point.
Kreider is one of the only players capable of actually winning a physical 1 on 1 battle and he is out.
Nash shies away from all contact.
MSL and MZA attempt to battle but are 5'6.
The issue we saw coming reared its ugly head in Game 2. It's no secret.
anyone else think, since knowing Emery is slow side-to-side, that we were trying too hard on making pretty passes and could've been distracting/frustrating? It works on the PP/Rushes, but seemed to give us trouble 5-on-5
Yes the Rangers are and where you sit in the standings is not fully indicative of the kind of team you are. If standings were everything they would just skip the playoffs and hand out the Stanley Cup along with the President's trophy.
Pivotal game tonight. Must take advantage of Emery still being in net.
I still don't understand why MSL and Nash need to be on the same line.
Hagelin-Stepan-Nash
Fast-Richards-MSL
Pouliot-Brassard-MZA
The major issue, as you and I have both pointed out, is the lack of anyone willing to go the dirty areas to retrieve pucks and fight the tough battles. This team is all skill at this point.
Kreider is one of the only players capable of actually winning a physical 1 on 1 battle and he is out.
Nash shies away from all contact.
MSL and MZA attempt to battle but are 5'6.
The issue we saw coming reared its ugly head in Game 2. It's no secret.
I expect better effort. However, the question remains are they willing to get their nose dirty when the Flyers stack at the blue line? They will need to chip the puck past the defense and go into corners.Totally agree. Rangers are the better team, and as long as we don't get outworked that will win out in the end.
He is not the savior, but Fast has been utterly invisible. A complete non-factor.So Carcillo is now the savior? Thank god we have him!