thebus2288*
Guest
I'm talking about the way he plays on the ice A LOT of the time. I'm not talking about all the other personal stuff. And the amount of points he has/gets does not trump everything to me. When I was younger I bought into the Nash hype. The goals, this play, that play. The teams losing or not playing good, but the player still puts up points. The player can't possibly be a problem right? Its always the team holding the great player back. Nash always needed a better center/team. To most of you Johansen is our only "1st line" player.
Once you buy into the hype of an "offensive star" it can be easy to let the little things(consistent effort, lazy play, defensive lapses) seem less important. Or sometimes even big things, like ACTUAL IMPACT on the ice. That's the reason most people either overrate or underrate a guy like Toews OR Dubinsky. Some people mock the idea of "intangibles" but its really just a fancy word to say they play the game the right way. Its also the same reason a lot of people will underrate or overrate a player like Ovechkin or Zherdev. Or the way we all know Nash can play for LONG periods of time. I guess a better comparison would be Nash. Most of the time he'll either bring IT, or, he wont. When you're the 1 or 1 of the guys that's counted on, either because of cap hit/salary or because your the captain or the "#1" center, people should NOT have to worry if IT is going to be brought.
Then things like this get overlooked. You can blame Prout if you want but this goal is not on him. Well not much.
Once you buy into the hype of an "offensive star" it can be easy to let the little things(consistent effort, lazy play, defensive lapses) seem less important. Or sometimes even big things, like ACTUAL IMPACT on the ice. That's the reason most people either overrate or underrate a guy like Toews OR Dubinsky. Some people mock the idea of "intangibles" but its really just a fancy word to say they play the game the right way. Its also the same reason a lot of people will underrate or overrate a player like Ovechkin or Zherdev. Or the way we all know Nash can play for LONG periods of time. I guess a better comparison would be Nash. Most of the time he'll either bring IT, or, he wont. When you're the 1 or 1 of the guys that's counted on, either because of cap hit/salary or because your the captain or the "#1" center, people should NOT have to worry if IT is going to be brought.
Then things like this get overlooked. You can blame Prout if you want but this goal is not on him. Well not much.