Redwingsfan
Global Moderator
- Jul 15, 2006
- 20,370
- 187
Howard's got a 91.5 SV% now. That sure got up to a decent level in a hurry. 15th overall and 9th out of the starters. Not too shabby..
Howard's got a 91.5 SV% now. That sure got up to a decent level in a hurry. 15th overall and 9th out of the starters. Not too shabby..
It helps a lot and those numbers look more Howard's like.Howard's got a 91.5 SV% now. That sure got up to a decent level in a hurry. 15th overall and 9th out of the starters. Not too shabby..
That's great, even for Babcock.0.875 EVS GAA over the past 8 games. Not bad, not bad at all.
Both Howard and defence have been better lately.Howard has had maybe three bad games all season. Our defense is just making up for the damage they inflicted earlier on the year.
Kindl had a great game.
If his recent play hasn't earned him the right to stay by now, I don't know what will. We knew all along the guy had the tools; looks likes he's finally starting to put it all together. Amazing what confidence - and a little ice time - can do.
should trade up to get himHowie played well, but D managed to keep Oils at bay. One of the best games by our D. Loved Kindl jumping up with the puck. Rookies were great. Z needs to get on the scoreboard. Brunner needs to do/learn some more dekes other than the one he always tries one-on-one. Well, earned win. Abdelkader with a great goal, awesome individual effort. Goalie had absolutely no chance, Abby beat him fair and square.
Good by Lindholm if we keep playing this way .
currently tied for 7th in GAA with habs (2.46), and 2nd in 5 on 5 GF/GA (1.38) behind only chicago (1.59).0.875 EVS GAA over the past 8 games. Not bad, not bad at all.
Why was Tatar and Andersson benched much of the 3rd period? I thought they played a great game so why not continue with them in the third?
Why was Tatar and Andersson benched much of the 3rd period? I thought they played a great game so why not continue with them in the third?
We won. Two points. TWO. MORE. POINTS. W in the win column. We got a shutout. We scored 3 goals. DOES IT FRIGGIN MATTER?
There's no reason not to play them, if he'd played them as much as previous two periods maybe the top2 lines end up with 1-2mins less TOI, conserve energy for columbus etc.
Why was Tatar and Andersson benched much of the 3rd period? I thought they played a great game so why not continue with them in the third?
Because the game was 2-0 not 3-0 or 4-0. How many games have we lost where we have been up 2-0 for them to comeback and win?
Play our most experienced and best defensive forwards and make sure we win. We cant afford to give games away with how close the standings are.
Why was Tatar and Andersson benched much of the 3rd period? I thought they played a great game so why not continue with them in the third?
It's pretty known at this point Babcock doesn't trust Tatar to take a defensive shift. He'll play him as long as we need offense. I think he trusts Andersson a little more but if you remove one player out of the rotation you remove a line.
I disagree with that coaching(having the puck in the offensive zone is the best defense and Andersson's line is very good at that), but that's the reasoning.
So my boys Smitty and Q are doing well?
Sounds like a 800k defenseman to me... oh wait Quincey gets 3.75MSmitty looks very green.
Quincey looks like a Lilja clone. They've completely taken offense out of his job description. He doesn't do any passes up the middle -- everything is up the boards.
they've minimized the damage he can create.
The other mind boggling stat from Quincey -- 10 Hits --
It's almost like Babcock pulled Quincey in and said .. Look dummy... you're not Bobby Orr and you're not Scott Stevens. No more passing. No more hitting. Just get the puck out of our end and don't take any penalties, or you're the next healthy scratch