Cherpak
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 5,059
- 3
Which one of those goals does Fleury stop? The breakaway goal was a standard Fleury goal against. There's no way Fleury would have gotten the 3rd one. So maybe he would have gotten the 1st goal? But again, that too was a backdoor goal that wasn't on Zatkoff.
Rangers know Zatkoff has issues with lateral mobility and they are exploiting it. Gonna be tough to get two on Hank in one period.
Do you not know who MAF is? Based on what.
Fleury probably stops two of those goals. The team plays scared in front of zackoff. It's all about mentality. The pens are scared of making a mistake because they know it's in their net. Seriously, a shooter tuiter is more challenging to score on then zackoff
he stickhandled it for the next 4 or 5 steps with 1 hand. He's a good NHL player.
And Fleury would have stopped that? Fleury lets in breakaway goals like that all of the time.
Not before he crossed the blue line he didn't. And who said he was a bad player? Quit making **** up.
The one where Brassard had like 4 square feet of net to shoot at on the blocker side.
We're still losing if Fleury or Murray are in net
Fleury's one of the best on breakaways. Look at his shootout numbers.
This is the slowest we've looked in months. Do guys just stop skating because Geno is in the lineup? I'm also confused as to how we manage to have two goalies get hurt for such a long period of time on relatively minor hits. Maybe minor is the wrong word but certainly seemed like things that other goalies play through. Oh well, I guess we stole one with Zatkoff in net and started getting greedy thinking we can win with anyone.
I don't mean to imply that I'm blaming Zatkoff. He's certainly been good enough. I just think Fleury is the kind of guy that changes things - not even necessarily on the ice, but the changes the psyche.
And a better goalie could have also let all of those goals in.
to many fancy style plays and not enough getting the puck deep. Pens look bad and that really is on the failure to take control of the game after going up 1. Either a wake up call that Pens can't show up and marvel at malkin.
They're playing like a team that started Lovejoy over Schultz. Not saying it's the one player, more the decision being a prelude to a lot of this.
Must confess . . . IcedCapp predicted this. Said, correctly, there have been a lot of red flags and that game 1 was a bit of a mirage with all the glorious chances the Rangers blew. Opined that he could see us losing the game in which Malkin returns.
I mean, the red flags have been there with HBK. Sid's line was **** in game 1 except when Sheary was on LW. Cullen and Kuhn have been quiet with Fehr. Those three have been a corsi nightmare. Add Cole-Lovejoy and Maatta making Hal Gill look like a speed skater and Zatkoff being human when the breakdowns happen today . . . it's like it's all hitting at once.
EDIT: As for Malkin, I personally think he should've played 10-12 minutes tonight. He's at 12 minutes already. You can see the game legs aren't there, which is in part why his play tailed big time starting late in the first. Among lowest offensive zone starts on the team. I expected Sully to handle him differently . . . think he got a little greedy.
Not likely.