If we are being real, remember that Kessel was on the Penguins 2nd line with Malkin. Crosby and Hornqvist were the center and right wing on the top line. So, he goes from being on the theoretical 2nd best line of the Penguins to the top line of the Coyotes. Obviously, Schmaltz, Dvorak, and Garland are doing more points-wise, but before the season, if you had to go on names on the jersey alone, your option would be to limit Kessel, Keller, and whomever is centering their line.
I've been largely supportive of Chayka, and the times that I wasn't (especially during the Hayton draft) he's proven me wrong. I think we're lucky to have this smug, self-satisfied young Wendy's franchisee in charge of the team.
I asked this question in one of the game day threads - does anyone really doubt what Chayka has done at this point? People are so misguided in this idea that he trades because he simply likes to. The trades that he has done, whether successful or not, have a clear goal to them. For Domi, it was about getting someone who could put the puck in the back of the net, as opposed to being a playmaker. That was probably the one trade that he has some regret on, but you can even tell in his interview that he thought highly of Max, but had to make a hockey deal. This wasn't done because a player wasn't improving at the rate we were hoping for, like Strome.
This is the first year that every piece of this team has the Chayka stamp of approval on it. In 16-17 and 17-18 season, he still had a decent share of Maloney era players that were good, but maybe not the most complete fits for the roster. Since the trade for Schmaltz, we are 39-26-10, which would basically be good for what, 88 points in 75 games, or a .586 P%. That would be a 96 point season pace. My question would be what players are you massively disappointed in that we kept over others?
I think his vision has been fantastic, even while people assumed that we lost trades or didn't give enough rope/leash to certain young players. Maybe the truth is that he has done a good job of identifying players who may not pan out to their expected value and replaced with players that have a greater shot at being more effective over the long haul. Domi not withstanding, but that's the only bad mark on a report card where our GM knew he was giving up a lot of value in Domi.