trip trancid
Registered User
- May 23, 2015
- 506
- 0
I think Dutchy's proven he can be a legit first line guy, the question of his ceiling remains though. I'm guessing he lands firmly in the "very good but not quite elite" category, which is fine. Not every team can be spoiled rotten with a Sakic/Forsberg tandem. I do, however, kinda expect MacKinnon to reach elite status. Time will tell.
One thing's for sure...we have yet to see Matt Duchene line up alongside wingers that truly complement him for a full season, or at least most of a season. We've seen brief snippets here and there (Fleischmann, Stewart when he was good) but for the most part we've never seen a top-flight talent still in his prime play on Duchene's wing...please correct me if I'm wrong here anyone.
I kinda wish the Avs would
Well...that's the thing. Avs shouldn't need to use them that much, not when they have Barrie and Zadorov rounding out that bottom four...with maybe Gormley and Stuart in there. But when you put clearly inferior pieces like Holden and Guenin, two guys you have to shelter the living **** out of for fear of them being exposed on a nightly basis, then yes, you're already over-relying on two guys who simply can't handle that level of workload.
I'm not expecting this team to contend...but I think they could be competitive if they ice a competitive lineup. Last night's lineup was not competitive. And it could (potentially) be with two, maybe three substitutions.
I realize it's not the same people saying different things but opinions swing drastically between extremes where Duchene and his linemates are concerned. Some blame his poor line mates but then others will ironically point to Fleischmann and Stewart as this golden age of Duchene chemistry. If Fleischmann and Stewart are this golden age of Duchene chemistry, how is it true that he requires a top level winger to lift his game?
Or is the core issue one of Duchene then vs now? Has he plateaued and is he possibly regressing? Has he been regressing for some time?
It's fairly enigmatic but I'm not sure if a more talented LW is the answer. I mean, if you put a more talented LW there, there might be an increase in production because there's a better player there. But would Duchenes improved chemistry with his line mate be commensurate with the actual improvement in talent at LW? Let's bear in mind, Duchene and Landeskog hasn't exactly been peanut butter and jelly.
If people refuse to admit regression, by bringing up Fleischmann, they're basically saying, he's hard to play with and its not about having some über talented LW next to him.