He isn't our best goalie until he proves it. 2 games isn't proof. Put your bias aside.
And LOL at Shesterkin is older. He's 41 days older. I have no idea why you thought that would help your argument.
What is my bias? This is such a weak argument. You can't put forth a better argument, so you claim someone has bias. My bias is to see the team have success. I've been accused of having every bias you could have for and against players. My bias is to the truth and to see my team have success. The people who claim the bias are usually the ones with the bias.
Why can't Shestyorkin be better? Was McDavid not better than a lot of players in the NHL before playing in the NHL? Was Panarin not better than a lot of players before playing in the NHL? And the whole point of what I'm saying is that Shestyorkin needs games, if you want to see if he can prove himself. Why will he have went 10+ days without playing by the next game? Georgiyev and Lundqvist are not top 20 goalies in the NHL. Why are they blocking a 24 year old who is so well regarded? It's not smart to have middle of your roster assets block one of your most important core players for the future. Why give games to the player you are going to trade instead of the one you want to keep?
Shestyorkin being older absolutely does help my argument. This idea that he's not better than Georgiyev or Lundqvist, but has so much more potential is partially bogus. I think he has higher potential than Georgiyev and obviously at this point he has better potential than Lundqvist for future seasons, but he's allowed to be better now. The lack of NHL games doesn't make him worse. He's better if he's better, not due to number of NHL games. If Shestyorkin isn't better right now than Georgiyev, he's probably not as good as touted, considering no one touts Georgiyev as a star. Shestyorkin is not raw either, and the lack of NHL games is essentially irrelevant towards deciding who is better. If Georgiyev is better, Shestyorkin isn't as good of a player as some think.