The Real Timo
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2019
- 14,787
- 18,426
Nate B and Joe Morrow got not Q either from the Jets..make that 3 former Habs set free
Nate the Great... Do it, Bergevin! He still has pretty good hair.
Nate B and Joe Morrow got not Q either from the Jets..make that 3 former Habs set free
Wayne Simmonds is such a ****ing bad idea.
Looks like last year was an aberration. They are just idiots who buy into whatever false narratives accompanies this year's Cup winner.
Blues as a team were bottom 5 amongst playoff teams for hits per game. Their leading scorers were all sub 6'0.
Idiotic
I don't care about both players... difference is one would cost an arm and leg... the other is RFA and we can get rid of him now or next year.My mole is better then your wart.
Lucic, Ladd, Clarksson, Backes... and now Simmonds... absolutely no f***ing need of Simmonds.Yeah lets trot out Drouin, Byron, Shaw, Gallagher, Domi, Tatar, Lehkonen and whatever other small forwards out there again and pray they don't get worn out by the end of February again when we go to Nashville or St louis. A 6'2 net presence is clearly just a god awful idea and will never work out here.
Lucic, Ladd, Clarksson, Backes... and now Simmonds... absolutely no ****ing need of Simmonds.
Lucic, Ladd, Clarksson, Backes... and now Simmonds... absolutely no ****ing need of Simmonds.
1.5M 1 year... seems the right pricenot sure i get that? Wayne is a leader...and not slow like some here claim ....At the RIGHT price..yes , he'd be a heck of a add for Habs ....
Someone will give him 3X 6millionObviously, signing him to a Lucic-like or Ladd-like deal would be awful. Nobody advocates for that. But let's say 2 years, between 3,000,000 and 3,500,000 a year, it COULD be a fine investment, depending on the role you give him.
I'm just not sure where we'd fit him with the plethora of wingers we have right now on the roster. But to say some toughness/grit/size wouldn't be welcome in our lineup is ridiculous. It's not a PRIMORDIAL need as finding a top-4 LHD is, but if there's room remaining under the cap, and the term is right, why the hell not?
Lucic, Ladd, Clarksson, Backes... and now Simmonds... absolutely no ****ing need of Simmonds.
1.5M 1 year... seems the right price
Only if it’s one of those hairy moles
That’s how I feel when I see Armia on the PP or the top 6
Do posters not get we were 2pts out of the playoffs?
And they wanna stand pat. C mon
Yeah lets trot out Drouin, Byron, Shaw, Gallagher, Domi, Tatar, Lehkonen and whatever other small forwards out there again and pray they don't get worn out by the end of February again when we go to Nashville or St louis. A 6'2 net presence is clearly just a god awful idea and will never work out here.
Yeah we should also acquire Andrew Ladd David Backes and Milan Lucic. Those guys were steals.
Yeah im definitely advocating for a 6-7 year Mega deal for Wayne Simmonds.
lol... unrealistic ...
He lives around the crease (like BGally)...good asset to have...
Simmonds is not even 20% of what Gallagher is right now
Scherbak tooNate B and Joe Morrow got not Q either from the Jets..make that 3 former Habs set free
Hope they stay far away from Simmonds. We got bailed out on Lucic by Edmonton being even dumber and going an extra year, I'm scared we won't get as lucky this time.
Miller?? 13 goals? 5.5 a year? The guy is average.
Byron and Shaw are better and coulda easily be traded to open up cap.
Who’s talking clarkson? That’s even worse. I wanna improve now. Not in 3 years.
Who said gardiner? Not meThe problem that you seem to want to ignore is that giving Jake Gardiner $7 million on a long term deal is not only not improving the team, it's eating up cap space that will soon be needed for players already on the roster and in the pipeline.
Gardiner is not the answer.